Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38961971›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Development of an AI predictive model to categorize and predict online learning behaviors of students in Thailand.

Jira Chonraksuk, Surapon Boonlue

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jira ChonraksukFaculty of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mongkut's University of Technology, Thailand.
Surapon BoonlueFaculty of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mongkut's University of Technology, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This qualitative study has three objectives: (1) to develop a predictive AI model to categorize the online learning behavior of Thai students who study through a Thai Massive Open Online Course (MOOC); (2) to categorize students' online behavior in a Thai MOOC; and (3) to evaluate the prediction accuracy of the developed predictive AI models. Data were collected from 8000 learners enrolled in the KMUTT015 course on the Thai MOOC platform. The k-means clustering algorithm classified learners enrolled in the Thai MOOC platform based on their online learning behaviors. The decision tree algorithm was used to assess the accuracy of the AI model prediction capability. The study finds the predictive AI model successfully categorizes learners based on their learning behaviors and predicts their future online learning behaviors in the online learning environment. The k-means clustering algorithm yields three groups of learners in the Thai MOOC platform: High Active Participants (HAP), Medium Active Participants (MAP), and Lurking participants. The findings also indicate high predictive accuracy rates for each behavioral group (HAP cluster = 0.98475, Lurking participants cluster = 0.967625, and MAP cluster = 0.955375), indicating the proficiency of the AI predictive model in forecasting learner behavior. The results of this study will benefit the design of online courses that respond to the needs of students with different online learning characteristics and help them achieve a high level of academic performance.

Indexed as

AI predictive modelOnline learningOnline learning behaviorThai MOOC

Identifiers

PMID38961971
PMCPMC11219963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.