Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38961931›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Analysis of the university experience of undergraduate students of Education degrees.

Lucía Herrera Torres, María Teresa Ramiro-Sánchez, Laura C Sánchez-Sánchez, Oswaldo Lorenzo Quiles, Teresa María Perandones González

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucía Herrera TorresDepartment of Evolutionary and Educational Psychology, University of Granada. Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences (Melilla Campus), Calle Santander, N° 1, 52071, Melilla, Spain.
María Teresa Ramiro-SánchezDepartment of Evolutionary and Educational Psychology, University of Granada. Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences (Melilla Campus), Calle Santander, N° 1, 52071, Melilla, Spain.
Laura C Sánchez-SánchezDepartment of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, University of Granada. Faculty de Psychology, Campus Cartuja, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Oswaldo Lorenzo QuilesDepartment of Didactics of Musical, Plastic and Body Expression, University of Granada. Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences (Melilla Campus), Calle Santander, N° 1, 52071, Melilla, Spain.
Teresa María Perandones GonzálezDepartment of Evolutionary and Educational Psychology, University of Granada. Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences (Melilla Campus), Calle Santander, N° 1, 52071, Melilla, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of the university experience of students is an increasingly frequent field of analysis among the academic community, as they represent one of the most important groups in universities and it is essential to know their opinion and satisfaction with the different services and resources that the university institution makes available to them. In this sense, the two objectives of the study were the following: 1) To analyse the undergraduate university experience of the different groups of students (graduates, students, drop-outs). 2) To identify which aspects of the academic training received predict each of the student groups. To this end, a study was carried out specifically aimed at undergraduate education students at the University of Granada (Spain), distinguishing between graduates, students, and those who had dropped out of their studies. A total of 292 students participated (82 female and 210 male), of whom 123 were graduates, 98 were still students and 71 were drop-outs. After the application of three questionnaires, it was found that the three aforementioned groups of participants coincided in particularly valuing characteristic dimensions of the formal teaching-learning scenario in the university experience. In addition, the linear regression analysis carried out identified the personalised attention factor as having the highest predictive value as regards student type. Thus, the results of the study point to an assessment of academic training focused on the need on the part of all three groups of participants for teacher support and individualised guidance. The study may be useful in providing universities with new data to help improve the teaching performance of Education degree teaching staff concerning students; for example, by encouraging their participation in tutorial action programmes.

Indexed as

Education degreesEducation qualityHigher educationPersonalised attentionStudent satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID38961931
PMCPMC11219341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.