ArticleHeliyon2024
High peripheral neutrophil and monocyte count distinguishes renal cell carcinoma from renal angiomyolipoma and predicts poor prognosis of renal cell carcinoma.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The presence of peripheral inflammatory cells has been linked to the prognosis of cancer. This study aims to investigate the distinct roles of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and absolute monocyte count (AMC) in differentiating renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from renal angiomyolipoma (RAML), as well as their prognostic significance in RCC. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive analysis of peripheral immune cell data, clinicopathological data, and tumor characteristics in patients diagnosed with RCC or RAML from January 2015 to December 2021. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, as well as univariate and multivariate analyses, were employed to assess the diagnostic utility of AMC and ANC in differentiating between RCC and RAML. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis was used to study the survival of RCC patients with different AMC and ANC. The prognostic value of AMC and ANC in RCC was investigated using COX univariate and multivariate analysis. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases were used for bioinformatic correlation analysis. Results: A total of 1120 eligible patients were included in the study. The mean preoperative AMC and ANC in patients with RCC were found to be significantly higher compared to those in patients with RAML (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). High preoperative AMC and ANC significantly correlated with smoking history, tumor length, gross hematuria, and high T Stage, N stage, and pathological grade. In multivariate analyses, an ANC> 3.205 *10^9/L was identified to be independently associated with the presence of RCC (HR = 1.618, P = 0.008). High AMC and ANC were significantly associated with reduced OS and PFS (P < 0.05), and ANC may be an independent prognostic factor. Public database analysis showed that signature genes of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) were highly expressed in ccRCC. Conclusions: Elevated preoperative ANC and AMC can distinguish RCC from RAML and predict poor prognosis in patients with RCC. Furthermore, the signature genes of TAMs and TANs exhibit high expression levels in clear cell RCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.