ArticleHeliyon2024
Integrating deep learning techniques for personalized learning pathways in higher education.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing anesthesia monitoring training: a SPOC and Gagné's model hybrid personalized by artificial intelligence.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Effectiveness of a multi-model teaching strategy to train emergency medicine residents to use point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for assessment of shock.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Integrating generative AI into physiotherapy education: students' use, perceptions, and generative AI literacy following curricular adaptations: a repeated cross-sectional programme evaluation.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Mapping Personalized Learning in Medical Education: A Meta-Synthesis of Artificial Intelligence Applications.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2026Review
- Dynamic teaching path generation for quadruped robot programming by integrating R-GCN and SBERT.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Hyper-RAG: combating LLM hallucinations using hypergraph-driven retrieval-augmented generation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- An exploration of instructional design for graduate education system in biomedical science: a mixedmethod design.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based AI model for predicting academic success and engagement among physical higher education students.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Intelligent Assessment Systems in Medical Education: A Systematic Review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience: Transformative Synergies in Brain Research and Clinical Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Analysis and optimization of student learning paths based on CRNN and sequential data.PloS one · 2025Article
- Reforming China's Secondary Vocational Medical Education: Adapting to the Challenges and Opportunities of the AI Era.JMIR medical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid improvement of artificial intelligence (AI) in the educational domain has opened new possibilities for enhancing the learning experiences for students. This research discusses the critical need for personalized education in higher education by integrating deep learning (DL) techniques to create customized learning pathways for students. This research intends to bridge the gap between constant educational content and dynamic student needs. This research presents an AI-driven adaptive learning platform implemented across four different courses and 300 students at a university in Faisalabad-Pakistan. A controlled experiment compares student outcomes between those using the AI platform and those undergoing traditional instruction. Quantitative results demonstrate a 25 % improvement in grades, test scores, and engagement for the AI group, with a statistical significance of a p-value of 0.00045. Qualitative feedback highlights enhanced experiences attributed to personalized pathways. The DL analysis of student performance data highlights key parameters, including enhanced learning outcomes and engagement metrices over time. Surveys reveal increased satisfaction compared to one-size-fits-all content. Unlike prior AI research lacking rigorous validation, our methodology and significant results deliver a concrete framework for institutions to implement personalized, AI-driven education at scale. This data-driven approach builds on previous attempts by tying adaptations to actual student needs, yielding measurable improvements in key outcomes. Overall, this work empirically validates that AI platforms leveraging robust analytics to provide customized and adaptive learning can significantly enhance student academic performance, engagement, and satisfaction compared to traditional approaches. These findings have insightful consequences for the future of higher education. The research contributes to the growing demand for AI in education research and provides a practical framework for institutions seeking to implement more adaptive and student-centric teaching methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.