ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Renal physiology2024
Sex-specific modulation of renal epigenetic and injury markers in aging kidney.
Article in American journal of physiology. Renal physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Chronic estrogen supplementation in the aging castrated male rat is not associated with renal injury or activation of the renin angiotensin system.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2026Article
- Steroid hormones and nephrolithiasis: regulation of urine components metabolism and inflammation.Biology of sex differences · 2026Review
- Protective Effects of a ProbioticFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- HMGB1 drives T-cell activation in hypertensive males and females.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sex differences in renal physiology and pathophysiology are now well established in rodent models and in humans. Epigenetic programming is known to be a critical component of renal injury, as studied mainly in male rodent models; however, not much is known about the impact of biological sex and age on the kidney epigenome. We sought to determine the influence of biological sex and age on renal epigenetic and injury markers, using male and female mice at 4 mo (4M; young), 12 mo (12M), and 24 mo (24M; aged) of age. Females had a significant increase in kidney and body weights and serum creatinine levels and a decrease in serum albumin levels from 4M to 24M of age, whereas minor changes were observed in male mice. Kidney injury molecule-1 levels in serum and renal tissue greatly enhanced from 12M to 24M in both males and females. Circulating histone 3 (H3; damage-associated molecular pattern molecules) levels extensively increased with age; however, males had higher levels than females. Overall, females had markedly high histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity than age-matched males. Aged mice had decreased HAT activity and increased histone deacetylase activity than sex-matched 12M mice. Aged females had substantially decreased renal H3 methylation at lysine 9 and 27 and histone methyltransferase (HMT) activity than aged male mice. Antiaging protein Klotho levels were significantly higher in young males than age-matched females and decreased substantially with age in males, whereas epigenetic repressor of Klotho, trimethylated H3K27, and its HMT enzyme, enhancer of zeste homolog 2, increased consistently with age in both sexes. Moreover, nuclear translocation and activity of proinflammatory transcription factor nuclear factor-κB (p65) were significantly higher in aged mice. Taken together, our data suggest that renal aging lies in a range between normal and diseased kidneys but may differ between female and male mice, highlighting sex-related differences in the aging process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.