ArticleJournal of liver cancer2024
Recent update of proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of liver cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of proton vs. photon radiotherapy for liver cancer: a meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Association of Chronological Age and Comorbidity Burden with Outcomes After Proton Beam Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancers · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based dose prediction in proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of network architectures and loss functions.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
- Recent advancements in radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
- Radiotherapy for Liver-Confined Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Elderly Patients with Comorbidity.Cancers · 2025Article
- Radiotherapy Combined with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor on Murine Fibrosarcoma and a Narrative Review of Clinical Studies.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Proton Radiotherapy Alone versus Combined with Immunotherapies or Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage B or C Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver cancer · 2025Article
- Navigating the Therapeutic Pathway and Optimal First-Line Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer in the Modern Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2025Review
- CAPG Regulates Doxorubicin Resistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells via TGFB1/Smad/Nrf2 Signalling Pathway.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- A concise review of updated global guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2017-2024.Journal of liver cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS/
aimsAlthough access to proton beam therapy (PBT) is limited worldwide, its use for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is gradually increasing with the expansion of new facilities. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis to investigate the updated evidence of PBT for HCC.
methodsThe MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies that enrolled patients with liver-confined HCC that were treated with PBT for a cure up to February 2024.
resultsA total of 1,858 HCC patients receiving PBT from 22 studies between 2004 and 2023 were selected for this meta-analysis. The median proportion of Child-Pugh class A was 86% (range, 41-100), and the median tumor size was 3.6 cm (range, 1.2-9.0). The median total dose ranged from 55 GyE to 76 GyE (median, 69). The pooled rates of 3- and 5-year local progression-free survival after PBT were 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85-91) and 86% (95% CI, 82-90), respectively. The pooled 3- and 5-year overall rates were 60% (95% CI, 54-66) and 46% (95% CI, 38-54), respectively. The pooled rates of grade 3 hepatic toxicity, classic radiationinduced liver disease (RILD), and non-classic RILD were 1%, 2%, and 1%, respectively.
conclusionsThe current study supports PBT for HCC and demonstrates favorable long-term survival and low hepatic toxicities compared with other published studies on other radiotherapy modalities. However, further studies are needed to identify the subgroups that will benefit from PBT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.