ArticleCritical care (London, England)2024
The impact of norepinephrine dose reporting heterogeneity on mortality prediction in septic shock patients.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Association of noradrenaline dose with mortality in critically ill patients: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- The role of esmolol in sepsis: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of Weight-based versus Absolute Norepinephrine Dosing on Mortality Risk in Obese Patients with Septic Shock: An Observational, Multicohort, Retrospective Study.Anesthesiology · 2026Observational
- The usual suspects: a pragmatic framework to identify and address reversible contributors in apparent refractory septic shock.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Mean arterial pressure-to-norepinephrine-equivalent dose ratio, rather than achieved mean arterial pressure alone, is associated with mortality in septic shock.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
- Relationship between norepinephrine dose and outcome in septic shock: a retrospective study.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Article
- Endothelial Activation and Stress Index as an Indicator of Early Hemodynamic Instability in Critically Ill Patients: A Single-Centre Observational Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Absolute, weight-based, fixed-dose, or phenotype-guided? Rethinking the meaning of vasopressor dose in critical care.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- Need for standardization in norepinephrine dosage in the management of septic shock.Revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud publica · 2025Article
- Norepinephrine formulation itself does not constitute heterogeneity in shock trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Norepinephrine pharmacolexicology: a chronological review of dose reporting and the implications of salt formulations.Intensive care medicine · 2025Review
- Analysis of the heterogeneous treatment effect of vasoactive drug dosage and time on hospital mortality across different sepsis phenotypes: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Diagnostic values of noradrenaline administered dose, procalcitonin (PCT) and blood lactic acid for septic shock.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNorepinephrine (NE) is a cornerstone drug in the management of septic shock, with its dose being used clinically as a marker of disease severity and as mortality predictor. However, variations in NE dose reporting either as salt formulations or base molecule may lead to misinterpretation of mortality risks and hinder the process of care.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database to assess the impact of NE dose reporting heterogeneity on mortality prediction in a cohort of septic shock patients. NE doses were converted from the base molecule to equivalent salt doses, and their ability to predict 28-day mortality at common severity dose cut-offs was compared.
results4086 eligible patients with septic shock were identified, with a median age of 68 [57-78] years, an admission SOFA score of 7 [6-10], and lactate at diagnosis of 3.2 [2.4-5.1] mmol/L. Median peak NE dose at day 1 was 0.24 [0.12-0.42] μg/kg/min, with a 28-day mortality of 39.3%. The NE dose showed significant heterogeneity in mortality prediction depending on which formulation was reported, with doses reported as bitartrate and tartrate presenting 65 (95% CI 79-43)% and 67 (95% CI 80-47)% lower ORs than base molecule, respectively. This divergence in prediction widened at increasing NE doses. When using a 1 μg/kg/min threshold, predicted mortality was 54 (95% CI 52-56)% and 83 (95% CI 80-87)% for tartrate formulation and base molecule, respectively.
conclusionsHeterogeneous reporting of NE doses significantly affects mortality prediction in septic shock. Standardizing NE dose reporting as base molecule could enhance risk stratification and improve processes of care. These findings underscore the importance of consistent NE dose reporting practices in critical care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.