Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38961457›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts2024

Phosphate limitation enhances malic acid production on nitrogen-rich molasses with Ustilago trichophora.

Luca Antonia Grebe, Philipp Georg Lichtenberg, Katharina Hürter, Eva Forsten, Katharina Miebach, Jochen Büchs, Jørgen Barsett Magnus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luca Antonia GrebeAVT-Biochemical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Forckenbeckstraße 51, 52074, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5532-5797
Philipp Georg LichtenbergAVT-Biochemical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Forckenbeckstraße 51, 52074, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0325-9913
Katharina HürterAVT-Biochemical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Forckenbeckstraße 51, 52074, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4333-6741
Eva ForstenAVT-Biochemical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Forckenbeckstraße 51, 52074, Aachen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5159-7402
Katharina MiebachAVT-Biochemical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Forckenbeckstraße 51, 52074, Aachen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5495-3761
Jochen BüchsAVT-Biochemical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Forckenbeckstraße 51, 52074, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2012-3476
Jørgen Barsett MagnusAVT-Biochemical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Forckenbeckstraße 51, 52074, Aachen, Germany. jorgen.magnus@avt.rwth-aachen.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4381-0088

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 031B1135B / 031B1135BX
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn important step in replacing petrochemical products with sustainable, cost-effective alternatives is the use of feedstocks other than, e.g., pure glucose in the fermentative production of platform chemicals. Ustilaginaceae offer the advantages of a wide substrate spectrum and naturally produce a versatile range of value-added compounds under nitrogen limitation. A promising candidate is the dicarboxylic acid malic acid, which may be applied as an acidulant in the food industry, a chelating agent in pharmaceuticals, or in biobased polymer production. However, fermentable residue streams from the food and agricultural industry with high nitrogen content, e.g., sugar beet molasses, are unsuited for processes with Ustilaginaceae, as they result in low product yields due to high biomass and low product formation.

resultsThis study uncovers challenges in evaluating complex feedstock applicability for microbial production processes, highlighting the role of secondary substrate limitations, internal storage molecules, and incomplete assimilation of these substrates. A microliter-scale screening method with online monitoring of microbial respiration was developed using malic acid production with Ustilago trichophora on molasses as an application example. Investigation into nitrogen, phosphate, sulphate, and magnesium limitations on a defined minimal medium demonstrated successful malic acid production under nitrogen and phosphate limitation. Furthermore, a reduction of nitrogen and phosphate in the elemental composition of U. trichophora was revealed under the respective secondary substrate limitation. These adaptive changes in combination with the intricate metabolic response hinder mathematical prediction of product formation and make the presented screening methodology for complex feedstocks imperative. In the next step, the screening was transferred to a molasses-based complex medium. It was determined that the organism assimilated only 25% and 50% of the elemental nitrogen and phosphorus present in molasses, respectively. Due to the overall low content of bioavailable phosphorus in molasses, the replacement of the state-of-the-art nitrogen limitation was shown to increase malic acid production by 65%.

conclusionThe identification of phosphate as a superior secondary substrate limitation for enhanced malic acid production opens up new opportunities for the effective utilization of molasses as a more sustainable and cost-effective substrate than, e.g., pure glucose for biobased platform chemical production.

Indexed as

Alternative feedstockBioavailabilityBioeconomyInternal phosphate storageMalic acidMolassesOnline monitoringPhosphate limitationPlatform chemicalUstilago trichophora

Identifiers

PMID38961457
PMCPMC11223335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.