Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38961326›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2024

Gut microbiota Parabacteroides distasonis enchances the efficacy of immunotherapy for bladder cancer by activating anti-tumor immune responses.

Benlin Wang, Yifeng Qiu, Ming Xie, Pengcheng Huang, Yao Yu, Qi Sun, Wentai Shangguan, Weijia Li, Zhangrui Zhu, Jingwen Xue and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The Urinary Microbiota and the Gut-Bladder Axis in Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Benlin Wang *Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yifeng Qiu *Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ming Xie *Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Pengcheng HuangDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yao YuDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qi SunDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wentai ShangguanDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Weijia LiDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhangrui ZhuDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jingwen XueDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhengyuan FengDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuexuan ZhuDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qishen YangDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Peng WuDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. doctorwupeng@gmail.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82173304Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province of China 2023B03J1245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBladder cancer(BCa) was a disease that seriously affects patients' quality of life and prognosis. To address this issue, many researches suggested that the gut microbiota modulated tumor response to treatment; however, this had not been well-characterized in bladder cancer. In this study, our objective was to determine whether the diversity and composition of the gut microbiota or the density of specific bacterial genera influence the prognosis of patients with bladder cancer.

methodsWe collected fecal samples from a total of 50 bladder cancer patients and 22 matched non-cancer individuals for 16S rDNA sequencing to investigate the distribution of Parabacteroides in these two groups. Further we conducted follow-up with cancer patients to access the impact of different genera of microorganisms on patients survival. We conducted a Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) and mono-colonization experiment with Parabacteroides distasonis to explore its potential enhancement of the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in MB49 tumor-bearing mice. Immunohistochemistry, transcriptomics and molecular experiment analyses were employed to uncover the underlying mechanisms.

resultsThe 16S rDNA showed that abundance of the genus Parabacteroides was elevated in the non-cancer control group compared to bladder cancer group. The results of tumor growth curves showed that a combination therapy of P. distasonis and ICIs treatment significantly delayed tumor growth and increased the intratumoral densities of both CD4

conclusionP. distasonis delivery combined with α-PD-1 mAb could be a new strategy to enhance the effect of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. This effect might be achieved by activating immune and antitumor related pathways.

Indexed as

BacteroidetesFecal Microbiota TransplantationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeImmunotherapyUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedAnimalsFecesFemaleHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMiddle AgedRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBladder cancerGut microbiotaImmune checkpoint inhibitorsParabacteroides distasonis

Identifiers

PMID38961326
PMCPMC11221038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.