Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38961276›Full record

ArticleNature cancer2024

A deep-learning framework to predict cancer treatment response from histopathology images through imputed transcriptomics.

Danh-Tai Hoang, Gal Dinstag, Eldad D Shulman, Leandro C Hermida, Doreen S Ben-Zvi, Efrat Elis, Katherine Caley, Stephen-John Sammut, Sanju Sinha, Neelam Sinha and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Danh-Tai HoangBiological Data Science Institute, College of Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia. danhtai.hoang@anu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2640-4196
Gal DinstagPangea Biomed Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel.
Eldad D ShulmanCancer Data Science Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1859-8819
Leandro C HermidaDepartment of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Doreen S Ben-ZviPangea Biomed Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8609-1286
Efrat ElisPangea Biomed Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel.
Katherine CaleyBiological Data Science Institute, College of Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8459-6168
Stephen-John SammutBreast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Sanju SinhaCancer Data Science Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2688-0603
Neelam SinhaCancer Data Science Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6496-224X
Christopher H DampierLaboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3099-6462
Chani StosselOncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center at Tel-Hashomer, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tejas PatilDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Arun RajanThoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2776-3385
Wiem LassouedCenter for Immuno-Oncology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Julius StraussCenter for Immuno-Oncology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Shania BaileyCenter for Immuno-Oncology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Clint AllenSurgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6586-5804
Jason RedmanCenter for Immuno-Oncology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8200-0167
Tuvik BekerPangea Biomed Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel.
Peng JiangCancer Data Science Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7828-5486
Talia GolanOncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center at Tel-Hashomer, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Scott WilkinsonLaboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2613-8425
Adam G SowalskyLaboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2760-1853
Sharon R PineDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5318-0277
Carlos CaldasSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3547-1489
James L GulleyGenitourinary Malignancy Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6569-2912
Kenneth AldapeLaboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5119-7550
Ranit AharonovPangea Biomed Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel.
Eric A StoneBiological Data Science Institute, College of Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia. eric.stone@anu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2725-4209
Eytan RuppinCancer Data Science Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. eytan.ruppin@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7862-3940

Funding

Anatomic Pathology Residency ProgramZIEBC011384 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI BARR, FREDERIC · 2011 to 2025
$26.8M
Molecular alterations driving the development of primary prostate cancersZIABC011679 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SOWALSKY, ADAM · 2016 to 2025
$6.9M
Mechanisms of resistance to treatment in aggressive prostate cancersZIABC011838 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SOWALSKY, ADAM · 2018 to 2025
$5.7M
Data-driven inference of regulators for cytokine-mediated tumor killingZIABC011889 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI JIANG, PENG · 2019 to 2025
$4.1M
Discovery and therapeutic targeting of biological determinants of lung cancer health disparitiesR01CA239093 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI PINE, SHARON R. · 2020 to 2025
$2.1M
Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science, Australian Research Council (ARC Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science) DP190103402Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS R01 CA239093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in artificial intelligence have paved the way for leveraging hematoxylin and eosin-stained tumor slides for precision oncology. We present ENLIGHT-DeepPT, an indirect two-step approach consisting of (1) DeepPT, a deep-learning framework that predicts genome-wide tumor mRNA expression from slides, and (2) ENLIGHT, which predicts response to targeted and immune therapies from the inferred expression values. We show that DeepPT successfully predicts transcriptomics in all 16 The Cancer Genome Atlas cohorts tested and generalizes well to two independent datasets. ENLIGHT-DeepPT successfully predicts true responders in five independent patient cohorts involving four different treatments spanning six cancer types, with an overall odds ratio of 2.28 and a 39.5% increased response rate among predicted responders versus the baseline rate. Notably, its prediction accuracy, obtained without any training on the treatment data, is comparable to that achieved by directly predicting the response from the images, which requires specific training on the treatment evaluation cohorts.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeoplasmsTranscriptomeGene Expression ProfilingHumansPrecision MedicineTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38961276
PMCPMC12413935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.