Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38961193›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2024

Efficacy of a nurse-led sexual rehabilitation intervention for women with gynaecological cancers receiving radiotherapy: results of a randomised trial.

Isabelle Suvaal, Susanna B Hummel, Jan-Willem M Mens, Charlotte C Tuijnman-Raasveld, Roula Tsonaka, Laura A Velema, Henrike Westerveld, Jeltsje S Cnossen, An Snyers, Ina M Jürgenliemk-Schulz and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03611517 (SPARC Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03611517 naunknown statusnot on this map

SPARC Study: A Nurse-led Sexual Rehabilitation Programme for Women With Gynaecological Cancers Receiving Radiotherapy: a Randomized Multicentre Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeiden University Medical CenterRan2018 to 2022Enrolled220ConditionsEndometrial Cancer, Cervical Cancer, Vaginal Cancer, Gynecologic CancerArmsSexual rehabilitation programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The role of nursing interventions in the management and outcomes of gynecological tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Isabelle SuvaalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2101-110X
Susanna B HummelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jan-Willem M MensDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Charlotte C Tuijnman-RaasveldDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Roula TsonakaDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Laura A VelemaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Henrike WesterveldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeltsje S CnossenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
An SnyersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ina M Jürgenliemk-SchulzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ludy C H W LutgensDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Maastro, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jannet C BeukemaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marie A D HaverkortDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapiegroep, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Marlies E NoweeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Remi A NoutDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Cor D de KroonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Wilbert B van den HoutDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Carien L CreutzbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7008-4321
Helena C van DoornDepartment of Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Moniek M Ter KuileDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. M.M.ter_Kuile@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3436-7073

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding (Dutch Cancer Society) 10674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe multicentre randomised SPARC trial evaluated the efficacy of a nurse-led sexual rehabilitation intervention on sexual functioning, distress, dilator use, and vaginal symptoms after radiotherapy for gynaecological cancers.

methodsEligible women were randomised to the rehabilitation intervention or care-as-usual. Four intervention sessions were scheduled over 12 months, with concurrent validated questionnaires and clinical assessments. Primary outcome was the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). A generalised-mixed-effects model compared groups over time.

resultsIn total, 229 women were included (n = 112 intervention; n = 117 care-as-usual). No differences in FSFI total scores were found between groups at any timepoint (P = 0.37), with 12-month scores of 22.57 (intervention) versus 21.76 (care-as-usual). The intervention did not significantly improve dilator use, reduce sexual distress or vaginal symptoms compared to care-as-usual. At 12 months, both groups had minimal physician-reported vaginal stenosis; 70% of women were sexually active and reported no or mild vaginal symptoms. After radiotherapy and brachytherapy, 85% (intervention) versus 75% (care-as-usual) of participants reported dilation twice weekly. DISCUSSION: Sexual rehabilitation for women treated with combined (chemo)radiotherapy and brachytherapy improved before and during the SPARC trial, which likely contributed to comparable study groups. Best practice involves a sexual rehabilitation appointment 1 month post-radiotherapy, including patient information, with dilator guidance, preferably by a trained nurse, and follow-up during the first year after treatment. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT03611517.

Indexed as

Genital Neoplasms, FemaleAdultAgedBrachytherapyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38961193
PMCPMC11369252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.