Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38961182›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

Five-year follow-up of the OptiTrain trial on concurrent resistance and high-intensity interval training during chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer.

Poorna Anandavadivelan, Sara Mijwel, Maria Wiklander, Philippe Lee Meeuw Kjoe, Maryse Luijendijk, Jonas Bergh, Helene Rundqvist, Yvonne Wengstrom

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Poorna AnandavadivelanDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. poorna.anandavadivelan@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-3471-1578
Sara MijwelDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria WiklanderDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Philippe Lee Meeuw KjoeDivision of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maryse LuijendijkDivision of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jonas BerghDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Helene RundqvistDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Yvonne WengstromDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Cancerfonden 130452The Cancer Society of Stockholm 131242The Swedish Cancer and Traffic Accident Foundation F-C-001225The Swedish Society for Medical Research SLS 50514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The protocol predefined aim of this study is to assess sustained effects of the OptiTrain trial on several health outcomes, 5 years after the baseline assessment. The OptiTrain study was a prospective, randomised controlled trial with 240 patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy that compared the effects of 16 weeks of two exercise programs, RT-HIIT and AT-HIIT, with usual care (UC). After a 5-year follow-up, eligible participants were evaluated for the primary outcome of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and secondary outcomes including quality of life, symptoms, muscle strength, cardiorespiratory fitness, body mass, physical activity, and sedentary behavior. Statistical analysis was conducted using linear mixed models adjusted for baseline values. Tumour profile and menopausal status were additionally adjusted for CRF. Mean differences (MD), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and standardized effect sizes (ES) were reported. At the 5-year follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in total CRF between the intervention groups and the UC group. RT-HIIT reported significantly reduced pain sensitivity at the gluteus MD = 79.00 (95% CI 10.17, 147.83, ES = 0.55) compared to UC. Clinically meaningful differences for an increase in cognitive CRF and cardiorespiratory fitness were observed for the AT-HIIT versus UC group, and for lower limb strength for the RT-HIIT versus UC group, albeit without statistical significance. Engaging in targeted exercise during adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer provides short-term benefits in reducing fatigue and maintaining physical function. However, our 5-year follow-up indicates that these effects are limited in the long term. This underscores the need to support breast cancer survivors maintain their PA levels throughout their survivorship journey.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFatigueHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingQuality of LifeResistance TrainingAdultAgedCardiorespiratory FitnessChemotherapy, AdjuvantExerciseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthProspective StudiesAdjuvant chemotherapyBreast cancerCognitive assessmentExerciseFatigueLong-term effectsPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID38961182
PMCPMC11222517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.