ArticleScientific reports2024
Characterization, comparison, and phylogenetic analyses of chloroplast genomes of Euphorbia species.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative study of the rare Incarvillea potaninii (Bignoniaceae) in Mongolia: conservation, comparative plastome, distribution modelling, phylogeny, and taxonomic insights.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Plastid genomes and phylogenomic relationships in Cheilosoideae, a poorly known early-diverging subfamily of Euphorbiaceae.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Complete chloroplast genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of 385 chloroplast genomes unveils phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history in cassava.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Phylogeny and evolutionary dynamics of the Rubia genus based on the chloroplast genome of Rubia tibetica.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025Article
- Intergeneric and interspecific relationships in tribe Ricineae revealed by phylogenomics of the plastome and transcriptome.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Morphological and chemotaxonomical characterization of some species of the genus Euphorbia L. in Jazan region, KSA.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The genus Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) has near-cosmopolitan distribution and serves as a significant resource for both ornamental and medicinal purposes. Despite its economic importance, Euphorbia's taxonomy has long been challenged by the intricate nature of morphological traits exhibiting high levels of convergence. While molecular markers are essential for phylogenetic studies, their availability for Euphorbia has been limited. To address this gap, we conducted comparative analyses focusing on the chloroplast (CP) genomes of nine Euphorbia species, incorporating three newly sequenced and annotated accessions. In addition, phylogenetic informativeness and nucleotide diversity were computed to identify candidate markers for phylogenetic analyses among closely related taxa in the genus. Our investigation revealed relatively conserved sizes and structures of CP genomes across the studied species, with notable interspecific variations observed primarily in non-coding regions and IR/SC borders. By leveraging phylogenetic informativeness and nucleotide diversity, we identified rpoB gene as the optimal candidate for species delimitation and shallow-level phylogenetic inference within the genus. Through this comprehensive analysis of CP genomes across multiple taxa, our study sheds light on the evolutionary dynamics and taxonomic intricacies of Euphorbia, offering valuable insights into its CP genome evolution and taxonomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.