Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38961025›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2025

Prevalence of Sexual Strangulation/Choking Among Australian 18-35 Year-Olds.

Leah S Sharman, Robin Fitzgerald, Heather Douglas

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leah S SharmanMelbourne Law School, Faculty of Law, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia. l.sharman1@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-1989-6380
Robin FitzgeraldFaculty of Humanities and Social Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1860-5716
Heather DouglasMelbourne Law School, Faculty of Law, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0420-3820

Funding

Australian Research Council DP200101020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Australia, strangulation has been explicitly criminalized in all states and territories. However, it continues to be a "normalized" sexual practice despite its potentially fatal consequences and associated short and long-term sequelae. This research aimed to establish the prevalence of strangulation during sex and examine predictors of positive perceptions toward sexual strangulation in Australia. Confidential, cross-sectional online surveys were conducted with 4702 Australians aged 18-35 years. Participants were 47% cis-men, 48% cis-women, and 4% trans or gender diverse. A total of 57% reported ever being sexually strangled (61% women, 43% men, 79% trans or gender diverse) and 51% reported ever strangling a partner (40% women, 59% men, 74% trans or gender diverse). Differences were found across genders on all variables of sexual strangulation, including frequency of engagement, level of pressure on the neck, consequences, wanting and enjoyment, and how consent was given/received. However, when split by gender, sexual orientation of men and women revealed further differences in behaviors, consequences, and wanting, particularly among straight and bisexual women. After accounting for exposure to strangulation in pornography and previous experience of sexual strangulation, positive perceptions of being strangled (R

Indexed as

Airway ObstructionAsphyxiaSexual BehaviorAdolescentAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceSexual PartnersSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAsphyxiationBreath playChokingSexual orientationStrangulationTransgender

Identifiers

PMID38961025
PMCPMC11836212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.