ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2024
Recent Update on Nanocarrier(s) as the Targeted Therapy for Breast Cancer.
Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Profiling and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies in Breast Cancer: Clinical Integration of HER2, CDK4/6, and PI3K Inhibition with Trastuzumab, Abemaciclib and Alpelisib.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Trastuzumab-Conjugated Nanoliposomes for Targeted Capecitabine Delivery to Suppress HER2-Positive Breast Tumor: Efficacy Analysis in NOD SCID Mice Xenografts.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Article
- Breast Cancer: Challenges in the Treatment and Prodrug Strategies.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Emerging Targeted and Multimodal Therapeutic Strategies in Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
- Recent Developments in Vesicular Nanocarriers for Targeted Drug Delivery in Breast Cancer.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- A Complete Sojourn of Liposomes in Breast Cancer Therapy: Types, Preparation Techniques, Lipid Selection, and Critical Quality Attributes.Current drug research reviews · 2026Review
- Brucein D suppresses breast cancer proliferation and migration via targeting the FAK/LRG1 signaling pathway.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Innovative approaches in breast cancer therapy: repurposing nanocarriers for enhanced outcomes.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- Current perspectives and global trends of nanotechnology in advanced breast cancer: a bibliometric and visualized analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- STAT3 Signaling Pathway in Health and Disease.MedComm · 2025Review
- Breaking Barriers in Breast Cancer: Multi-Targeted Therapeutic Insights.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- How Effective are Key Phytocompound Carrying Polysaccharide Nanocarriers as Anti-Breast Cancer Therapy? A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite ongoing advances in cancer therapy, the results for the treatment of breast cancer are not satisfactory. The advent of nanotechnology promises to be an essential tool to improve drug delivery effectiveness in cancer therapy. Nanotechnology provides an opportunity to enhance the treatment modality by preventing degradation, improving tumour targeting, and controlling drug release. Recent advances have revealed several strategies to prevent cancer metastasis using nano-drug delivery systems (NDDS). These strategies include the design of appropriate nanocarriers loaded with anti-cancer drugs that target the optimization of physicochemical properties, modulate the tumour microenvironment, and target biomimetic techniques. Nanocarriers have emerged as a preferential approach in the chemotropic treatment for breast cancer due to their pivotal role in safeguarding the therapeutic agents against degradation. They facilitate efficient drug concentration in targeted cells, surmount the resistance of drugs, and possess a small size. Nevertheless, these nanocarrier(s) have some limitations, such as less permeability across the barrier and low bioavailability of loaded drugs. To overcome these challenges, integrating external stimuli has been employed, encompassing infrared light, thermal stimulation, microwaves, and X-rays. Among these stimuli, ultrasound-triggered nanocarriers have gained significant attention due to their cost-effectiveness, non-invasive nature, specificity, ability to penetrate tissues, and capacity to deliver elevated drug concentrations to intended targets. This article comprehensively reviews recent advancements in different nanocarriers for breast cancer chemotherapy. It also delves into the associated hurdles and offers valuable insights into the prospective directions for this innovative field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38961013What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.