Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38960985›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024

Fully automated determination of robotic pedicle screw accuracy and precision utilizing computer vision algorithms.

Benjamin N Groisser, Ankush Thakur, Howard J Hillstrom, Akshitha Adhiyaman, Colson Zucker, Jerry Du, Matthew Cunningham, M Timothy Hresko, Ram Haddas, John Blanco and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Benjamin N GroisserHospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Ankush ThakurHospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Howard J HillstromHospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Akshitha AdhiyamanHospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Colson ZuckerHospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Jerry DuHospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Matthew CunninghamHospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
M Timothy HreskoBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ram HaddasUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
John BlancoHospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Hollis G PotterHospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Douglas N MintzHospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Ryan E BreighnerHospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Jessica H HeyerHospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA. heyerj@hss.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4895-6944
Roger F WidmannHospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, pedicle screw accuracy measurements have relied on CT and expert visual assessment of the position of pedicle screws relative to preoperative plans. Proper pedicle screw placement is necessary to avoid complications, cost and morbidity of revision procedures. The aim of this study was to determine accuracy and precision of pedicle screw insertion via a novel computer vision algorithm using preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Three cadaveric specimens were utilized. Screw placement planning on preoperative CT was performed according to standard clinical practice. Two experienced surgeons performed bilateral T2-L4 instrumentation using robotic-assisted navigation. Postoperative CT scans of the instrumented levels were obtained. Automated segmentation and computer vision techniques were employed to align each preoperative vertebra with its postoperative counterpart and then compare screw positions along all three axes. Registration accuracy was assessed by preoperatively embedding spherical markers (tantalum beads) to measure discrepancies in landmark alignment. Eighty-eight pedicle screws were placed in 3 cadavers' spines. Automated registrations between pre- and postoperative CT achieved sub-voxel accuracy. For the screw tip and tail, the mean three-dimensional errors were 1.67 mm and 1.78 mm, respectively. Mean angular deviation of screw axes from plan was 1.58°. For screw mid-pedicular accuracy, mean absolute error in the medial-lateral and superior-inferior directions were 0.75 mm and 0.60 mm, respectively. This study introduces automated algorithms for determining accuracy and precision of planned pedicle screws. Our accuracy outcomes are comparable or superior to recent robotic-assisted in vivo and cadaver studies. This computerized workflow establishes a standardized protocol for assessing pedicle screw placement accuracy and precision and provides detailed 3D translational and angular accuracy and precision for baseline comparison.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCadaverPedicle ScrewsRobotic Surgical ProceduresTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansLumbar VertebraeSpinal FusionSurgery, Computer-AssistedAccuracyAutomated computer algorithmPedicle screwRobotic navigation

Identifiers

PMID38960985
PMCPMC11222209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.