ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Image quality of whole-body diffusion MR images comparing deep-learning accelerated and conventional sequences.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shifting from black box decisions to informed decision-making in using artificial intelligence to analyze prostate MRI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- The evolving PI-RADS paradigm.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Review
- Observational
- Radiology AI and sustainability paradox: environmental, economic, and social dimensions.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Diffusion-weighted imaging increases the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing rectal cancer T stage and reduces intra- and interobserver variability.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the image quality of deep learning accelerated whole-body (WB) with conventional diffusion sequences.
methodsFifty consecutive patients with bone marrow cancer underwent WB-MRI. Two experts compared axial b900 s/mm
resultsOverall, radiologists preferred either axial DRB b900 and/or corresponding MIP images in almost 80% of the patients, particularly in patients with a high body-mass index (BMI > 25 kg/m
conclusionDRB sequences produce higher-quality axial DWI, resulting in improved MIPs and significantly reduced acquisition times. However, differences in the ADC values of normal tissues need to be considered. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Deep learning accelerated diffusion sequences produce high-quality axial images and MIP at reduced acquisition times. This advancement could enable the increased adoption of Whole Body-MRI for the evaluation of patients with bone marrow cancer. KEY POINTS: Deep learning reconstruction enables a more than 50% reduction in acquisition time for WB diffusion sequences. DRB images were preferred by radiologists in almost 80% of cases due to fewer artefacts, improved background signal suppression, higher signal-to-noise ratio, and increased lesion conspicuity in patients with higher body mass index. Cancer lesion diffusivity from DRB images was not different from conventional sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38960946What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.