Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38960946›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Image quality of whole-body diffusion MR images comparing deep-learning accelerated and conventional sequences.

Andrea Ponsiglione, Will McGuire, Giuseppe Petralia, Marie Fennessy, Thomas Benkert, Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione, Anwar R Padhani

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The evolving PI-RADS paradigm.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea PonsiglioneDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Will McGuirePaul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom.
Giuseppe PetraliaDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Marie FennessyPaul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom.
Thomas BenkertMR Application Predevelopment, Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany.
Alfonso Maria PonsiglioneDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Anwar R PadhaniPaul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom. anwar.padhani@stricklandscanner.org.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5830-5777

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the image quality of deep learning accelerated whole-body (WB) with conventional diffusion sequences.

methodsFifty consecutive patients with bone marrow cancer underwent WB-MRI. Two experts compared axial b900 s/mm

resultsOverall, radiologists preferred either axial DRB b900 and/or corresponding MIP images in almost 80% of the patients, particularly in patients with a high body-mass index (BMI > 25 kg/m

conclusionDRB sequences produce higher-quality axial DWI, resulting in improved MIPs and significantly reduced acquisition times. However, differences in the ADC values of normal tissues need to be considered. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Deep learning accelerated diffusion sequences produce high-quality axial images and MIP at reduced acquisition times. This advancement could enable the increased adoption of Whole Body-MRI for the evaluation of patients with bone marrow cancer. KEY POINTS: Deep learning reconstruction enables a more than 50% reduction in acquisition time for WB diffusion sequences. DRB images were preferred by radiologists in almost 80% of cases due to fewer artefacts, improved background signal suppression, higher signal-to-noise ratio, and increased lesion conspicuity in patients with higher body mass index. Cancer lesion diffusivity from DRB images was not different from conventional sequences.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingWhole Body ImagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArtifactsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSignal-To-Noise RatioArtificial intelligenceCancerDeep-learningDiffusion-weighted imagingMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.