Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38960872›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology and biotechnology2024

Comparing Gut Microbial Composition and Functional Adaptations between SPF and Non-SPF Pigs.

Haesun Lee, Woncheoul Park, Jingu No, Nam Woong Hyung, Ju-Yeong Lee, Seokho Kim, Hyeon Yang, Poongyeon Lee, Eunju Kim, Keon Bong Oh and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Effects of Vitamin DAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Haesun LeeAnimal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanjugun, Jeollabuk-do 55365, Republic of Korea.
Woncheoul ParkAnimal Genomics and Bioinformatics Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju-gun, Jeollabuk-do 55365, Republic of Korea.
Jingu NoAnimal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanjugun, Jeollabuk-do 55365, Republic of Korea.
Nam Woong HyungAnimal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanjugun, Jeollabuk-do 55365, Republic of Korea.
Ju-Yeong LeeAnimal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanjugun, Jeollabuk-do 55365, Republic of Korea.
Seokho KimAnimal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanjugun, Jeollabuk-do 55365, Republic of Korea.
Hyeon YangAnimal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanjugun, Jeollabuk-do 55365, Republic of Korea.
Poongyeon LeeAnimal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanjugun, Jeollabuk-do 55365, Republic of Korea.
Eunju KimHanwoo Research Institute, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju-gun, Jeollabuk-do 55365, Republic of Korea.
Keon Bong OhAnimal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanjugun, Jeollabuk-do 55365, Republic of Korea.
Jae Gyu YooAnimal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanjugun, Jeollabuk-do 55365, Republic of Korea.
Seunghoon LeeAnimal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanjugun, Jeollabuk-do 55365, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota is a key factor significantly impacting host health by influencing metabolism and immune function. Its composition can be altered by genetic factors, as well as environmental factors such as the host's surroundings, diet, and antibiotic usage. This study aims to examine how the characteristics of the gut microbiota in pigs, used as source animals for xenotransplantation, vary depending on their rearing environment. We compared the diversity and composition of gut microbiota in fecal samples from pigs raised in specific pathogen-free (SPF) and conventional (non-SPF) facilities. The 16S RNA metagenome sequencing results revealed that pigs raised in non-SPF facilities exhibited greater gut microbiota diversity compared to those in SPF facilities. Genera such as

Indexed as

BacteriaFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsMetagenomeSpecific Pathogen-Free OrganismsSwineRNA, Ribosomal, 16SGut microbiomeminiature pigspecific pathogen free

Identifiers

PMID38960872
PMCPMC11294643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.