Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38960791›Full record

SynthesisDisability and health journal2024

Responsible inclusion: A systematic review of consent to social-behavioral research with adults with intellectual disability in the US.

Katherine E McDonald, Ariel E Schwartz, Robert Dinerstein, Robert Olick, Maya Sabatello

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Disability and health journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Healthy ageing for older adult people with intellectual disability: a scoping review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Adults with Intellectual Disability and Consent to Precision Medicine Research: Using Supported Decision-Making to Facilitate First-Person Consent.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine E McDonaldPublic Health, Falk College, Syracuse University, 315-443-5313, 440 White Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA. Electronic address: kemcdona@syr.edu.
Ariel E SchwartzInstitute on Disability, University of New Hampshire, 10 West Edge, Durham, NH 03824, USA. Electronic address: Ariel.schwartz@unh.edu.
Robert DinersteinCollege of Law, American University, Washington, DC, USA.
Robert OlickCenter for Bioethics and Humanities, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Maya SabatelloColumbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Including Adults with Intellectual Disability in Precision Medicine Research - Project ENGAGER01HD108701 · NICHD · SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY · PI Katherine Elizabeth McDonald, Maya Sabatello · 2022 to 2026
$3.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD108701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recognition of their status as a health disparities population, there is growing emphasis on conducting research inclusive of adults with intellectual disability to generate new knowledge and opportunities to improve health and equity. Yet they are often excluded from research, and human research participant protection experts and researchers lack agreement on effective consent protocols for their inclusion.

objectiveWe sought to identify approaches to consent in US-based social-behavioral research with adults with intellectual disability.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review on approaches to self-consent with adults with intellectual disability published between 2009 and 2023, identified via searching eight databases and reference list hand searches. We identified 13 manuscripts and conducted a thematic analysis.

resultsOur analysis identified themes related to guiding principles, strategies to enhance informed and voluntary consent, approaches to consent capacity, involving individuals subject to guardianship, and strategies for expressing decisions and enhancing ongoing decisions.

conclusionsManuscripts largely reflected an emphasis on identifying approaches to consent that reflect disability rights principles to promote the right to be included and make one's own decisions based on assessment of relevant information, risks and benefits, and to employ reasonable modifications to achieve inclusion. To avoid the risks of exclusion and advance the responsible inclusion of adults with intellectual disability, we make recommendations to align consent approaches anchored in contemporary thinking about human research participant protections, including through integration with disability rights.

Indexed as

Informed ConsentIntellectual DisabilityPersons with DisabilitiesAdultBehavioral ResearchDecision MakingHumansUnited StatesConsent capacityConsent to researchIntellectual disabilityResearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID38960791
PMCPMC13285379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.