ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2024
Genomic instability in non-breast or ovarian malignancies of individuals with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating germline and tumor sequencing to improve hereditary cancer diagnosis and care.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- The Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank and its central role in health research.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Shallow Whole-Genome Sequencing to Assess Genomic Instability and Predict Treatment Response in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- HRD in endometrial cancer: LST loss drives distinct genomic profile and platinum response.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- PIBF1 (p.R405Q) germline variant identified in cancer susceptibility family impairs protein stability and function.Cancer cell international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 are at a high risk of breast and ovarian carcinomas with BRCA1/2 deficiency and homologous recombination deficiency that can be detected by analysis of genome-wide genomic instability features such as large-scale state transitions, telomeric allelic imbalances, and genomic loss of heterozygosity. Malignancies with homologous recombination deficiency are more sensitive to platinum-based therapies and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We investigated the fraction of non-breast or ovarian malignancies that have BRCA1/2 deficiency and genomic instability features.
methodsThe full tumor history of a large, historical, clinic-based, consecutive cohort of 2965 individuals with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 was retrieved from the Dutch nationwide pathology databank (Palga). In total, 169 non-breast or ovarian malignancies were collected and analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing and shallow whole-genome sequencing to determine somatic second-hit alterations and genomic instabilities indicative of homologous recombination deficiency, respectively.
resultsBRCA1/2 deficiency was detected in 27% (21/79) and 23% (21/90) of 20 different types of non-breast or ovarian malignancies in individuals with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. These malignancies had a higher genomic instability score than BRCA1- or BRCA2-proficient malignancies (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively).
conclusionsBRCA1/2 deficiency and genomic instability features were found in 27% and 23% of a broad spectrum of non-breast or ovarian malignancies in individuals with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. Evaluation of the effectiveness of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in these individuals should be focused on tumors with a confirmed absence of a wild-type allele.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.