ArticleEnvironmental health and preventive medicine2024
Metabolic syndrome and depression: evidence from a cross-sectional study of real-world data in Japan.
Article in Environmental health and preventive medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of a combined care ambulatory and home-based aerobic exercise program using wearables on anxiety and depression in patients with metabolic syndrome.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Assessment of the Representation of Civil Servants as the General Population in Terms of Health Checkup Data.Cureus · 2025Article
- Association between metabolic syndrome and risk of incident low back pain: A retrospective cohort study using real-world data from Japan.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- Role of sirtuin 1 in depression‑induced coronary heart disease: Molecular pathways and therapeutic potential (Review).Biomedical reports · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBoth metabolic syndrome (MetS) and depression are high priority health problems, especially for working age. Numerous studies have explored the link between metabolic syndrome and depression; however, not all of them have consistently demonstrated an association. The objective of this study was to determine whether there is an association between MetS and depression by analyzing extensive real-world data (RWD).
methodsOur data was drawn from insurance claims and health checkups of local government officials across all prefectures in Japan except for Tokyo in the 2019 fiscal year. According to the number of months with diagnosis of depression and prescription of antidepressants, the study participants were classified into the following categories: Certainly not Depression (CN), Possibly not Depression (PN), Possible Depression (PD), and Certain Depression (CD). Associations between MetS and its components-visceral obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes- and these categories of depression were analyzed by logistic regression.
resultsThe depression categories of the 130,059 participants were as follows: CN 85.2%; PN 6.9%; PD 3.9%; and CD 4.1%. For men, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for MetS were PN 0.94 (95% CI: 0.86-1.02), PD 1.31 (1.19-1.43), and CD 1.63 (1.50-1.76), with reference to CN. For women, AOR of MetS were PN 1.10 (0.91-1.32), PD 1.54 (1.24-1.91), and CD 2.24 (1.81-2.78). Among the MetS components, visceral obesity, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes were significantly associated with depression categories.
conclusionsIn this study, we found a significant association between MetS and depression, this association being similar to that previously reported. Our findings provide robust evidence for linkage between MetS and depression, suggesting that analysis of RWD is useful for providing concrete evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.