ArticleSexually transmitted infections2024
Comparison of shipping versus immediate freezer storage of vaginal samples for vaginal microbiota assessment.
Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
ObjectivesWe evaluated how storing vaginal samples at room temperature in stabilising solutions versus immediate freezing affects 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing-based microbiota studies, aiming to simplify home and field collection.
methodsTwenty participants self-collected six mid-vaginal swabs that were stored in two nucleic acid preservatives (three in modified Solution C2 (Qiagen) and three in Amies/RNALater (Sigma)) in January-February 2016. From each set, two were immediately frozen (-80°C) and one was shipped to the University of Idaho (Moscow, Idaho) with return shipping to the Institute for Genome Sciences (Baltimore, Maryland). Amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene was used to characterise the vaginal microbiota, VALENCIA was used to assign community state types (CSTs), and quantitative PCR (qPCR) of 16S rRNA genes was used to estimate bacterial abundance. Cohen's Kappa statistic was used to assess within-participant agreement. Bayesian difference of means models assessed within-participant comparisons between shipped and immediately frozen samples.
resultsThere were 115 samples available for analysis. Average duration of transit for shipped samples was 8 days (SD: 1.60, range: 6-11). Within-participant comparisons of CSTs between shipped and immediately frozen samples revealed complete concordance (kappa: 1.0) for both preservative solutions. No significant differences comparing shipped and immediately frozen samples were found with taxon-level comparisons or bacterial abundances based on pan-bacterial qPCR.
conclusionsShort-term room temperature shipping of vaginal swabs placed in stabilising solutions did not affect vaginal microbiota composition. Home collection with mail-in of vaginal samples may be a reasonable approach for research and clinical purposes to assess the vaginal microbiota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.