ArticleAnalytical chemistry2024
Estimating LoD-s Based on the Ionization Efficiency Values for the Reporting and Harmonization of Amenable Chemical Space in Nontargeted Screening LC/ESI/HRMS.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ionization efficiency prediction of electrospray ionization mass spectrometry analytes based on molecular fingerprints and cumulative neutral losses.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive and Ultrasensitive Isotope Calibration Method for Soil Amino Compounds Using Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nontargeted LC/ESI/HRMS aims to detect and identify organic compounds present in the environment without prior knowledge; however, in practice no LC/ESI/HRMS method is capable of detecting all chemicals, and the scope depends on the instrumental conditions. Different experimental conditions, instruments, and methods used for sample preparation and nontargeted LC/ESI/HRMS as well as different workflows for data processing may lead to challenges in communicating the results and sharing data between laboratories as well as reduced reproducibility. One of the reasons is that only a fraction of method performance characteristics can be determined for a nontargeted analysis method due to the lack of prior information and analytical standards of the chemicals present in the sample. The limit of detection (LoD) is one of the most important performance characteristics in target analysis and directly describes the detectability of a chemical. Recently, the identification and quantification in nontargeted LC/ESI/HRMS (e.g., via predicting ionization efficiency, risk scores, and retention times) have significantly improved due to employing machine learning. In this work, we hypothesize that the predicted ionization efficiency could be used to estimate LoD and thereby enable evaluating the suitability of the LC/ESI/HRMS nontargeted method for the detection of suspected chemicals even if analytical standards are lacking. For this, 221 representative compounds were selected from the NORMAN SusDat list (S0), and LoD values were determined by using 4 complementary approaches. The LoD values were correlated to ionization efficiency values predicted with previously trained random forest regression. A robust regression was then used to estimate LoD values of unknown features detected in the nontargeted screening of wastewater samples. These estimated LoD values were used for prioritization of the unknown features. Furthermore, we present LoD values for the NORMAN SusDat list with a reversed-phase C
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.