Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38959279›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Targeted psychological and psychosocial interventions for auditory hallucinations in persons with psychotic disorders: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laura Fässler, Irene Bighelli, Stefan Leucht, Michel Sabé, Malek Bajbouj, Christine Knaevelsrud, Kerem Böge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura FässlerDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-1022-8521
Irene BighelliDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany.
Stefan LeuchtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany.
Michel SabéDivision of Psychiatric Specialties, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8530-5596
Malek BajboujDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christine KnaevelsrudDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Kerem BögeDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, a growing body of evidence has demonstrated the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) including positive symptoms such as auditory hallucinations (AH). However, clinical trials predominantly examine general treatment effects for positive symptoms. Therefore, previous research is lacking in comprehensive and clear evidence about psychological and psychosocial approaches that are primarily tailored to treat AH. To overcome this knowledge gap in the current literature, we will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of clearly targeted psychological and psychosocial interventions for AH in persons with SSD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study protocol has been developed according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols. We will include all randomized controlled trials analyzing the efficacy of targeted psychological and psychosocial interventions especially aimed at treating AH in SSD. We will include studies on adult patients with SSD experiencing AH. The primary outcome will be the change on a published rating scale measuring AH. Secondary outcomes will be delusions, overall symptoms, negative symptoms, depression, social functioning, quality of life, and acceptability (drop-out). We will search relevant databases and the reference lists of included literature. The study selection process will be conducted by two independent reviewers. We will conduct a random-effect meta-analysis to consider heterogeneity across studies. Analyses will be carried out by software packages in R. The risk of bias in each study will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Assessment of heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis will be conducted. DISCUSSION: The proposed study will augment the existing evidence by providing an overview of effective treatment approaches and their overall efficacy at treating AH in SSD. These findings will complement existing evidence that may impact future treatment implementations in clinical practice by addressing effective strategies to treat AH and therefore improve outcomes for the addressed population. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical issues are foreseen. We will publish the results from this study in peer-reviewed journals and at relevant scientific conferences.

trial registrationPROSPERO registration number: CRD42023475704.

Indexed as

HallucinationsPsychosocial InterventionPsychotic DisordersSystematic Reviews as TopicHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPsychotherapyQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID38959279
PMCPMC11221679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.