ArticlePloS one2024
Clinicopathologic features and outcomes of bilateral lacrimal gland lesions.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe present study reviewed the clinicopathological features and outcomes of bilateral lacrimal gland lesions.
methodsThe data of 113 patients who underwent lacrimal gland biopsy at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University, China, between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021, are presented in this case series. The patients all presented with bilateral lacrimal gland lesions. The collected data included patient demographics, clinical features, the results of laboratory examinations, imaging presentations, histopathological diagnoses, treatments, and outcomes.
resultsThe mean age of the 113 enrolled patients was 47.4 ± 14.9 years (range, 11-77 years) with a predominance of females (54.9%, n = 62). The lacrimal gland was the source of the majority of biopsy tissue (98.2%, n = 111). The most prevalent etiology was immunoglobulin G4-related ophthalmic disease (IgG4-ROD) (32.7%, n = 37), followed by idiopathic orbital inflammation (IOI) (28.3%, n = 32), mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma (17.7%, n = 20), reactive lymphoid hyperplasia (RLH) (10.6%, n = 12), and mantle cell lymphoma (4.4%, n = 5). Patients with IOI were significantly younger than those with IgG4-ROD and MALT lymphoma (t = 2.932, P = 0.005; t = 3.865, P<0.001, respectively). Systemic symptoms were more prevalent among patients with IgG4-ROD (χ2 = 7.916, P = 0.005). The majority of patients were treated with surgery (53.1%, n = 60), with surgery combined with corticosteroid therapy (21.2%, n = 24) being the second most common treatment. The majority of patients (91.2%, n = 103) attained complete resolution, stable disease, or significant improvement.
conclusionIn conclusion, there are several aetiologies associated with bilateral lacrimal gland lesions, the most prevalent being IgG4-ROD, IOI, and MALT lymphoma. Systemic symptoms were more common in patients with IgG4-ROD. The majority of patients who presented with bilateral lesions of the lacrimal glands responded satisfactorily to treatment, with favorable results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.