Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38959267›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health services in humanitarian and fragile settings: A mixed methods study of midwives' and women's experiences.

T Dey, M G Shah, A Baba, N Mugo, T Thommesen, V Vivilaki, M Boniol, N Alam, M Dibley, D Okoro and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

T DeyPartnership for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1326-5107
M G ShahPartnership for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health, Geneva, Switzerland.
A BabaInstitut Panafricain de Santé Communautaire, Aru, Democratic Republic of Congo.
N MugoNSW Health, Priority population Unit, Integrated and community health, Cumberland Hospital, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9300-788X
T ThommesenStavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
V VivilakiInternational Confederation of Midwives (ICM), The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7111-481X
M BoniolWorld Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland.
N AlamUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
M DibleyUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
D OkoroUnited Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), New York, United States of America.
P Tenhoope-BenderUnited Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), New York, United States of America.
T TriantafyllouUniversity of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
E V LangloisPartnership for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insufficient progress has been made to reduce morbidity and mortality for women, children and adolescents particularly in Humanitarian and Fragile settings (HFS). Midwives play a critical and unique role in ensuring communities receive quality and safe essential sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health services. A lack of knowledge exists on the availability and experiences of midwifery services in HFS. This manuscript provides an overview of the midwifery density in HFS and a synthesis of the experiences of women receiving midwifery care, and barriers and facilitators for midwives providing essential SRMNCAH services in HFS. Guided by an expert committee, a concurrent mixed methods approach was applied, using secondary analysis of primary quantitative and qualitative data sources. Quantitative analysis of the global distribution of midwives compared to fragility was undertaken. Qualitative analysis of experiences of receipt and provision of midwifery care was undertaken across four settings providing humanitarian care. There is a critically low density of midwives in humanitarian and fragile settings. Sub-Saharan Africa accounts for the highest levels of fragility yet lowest density of midwives able to provide SRMNCAH services. Lack of finances both constrains midwives from effectively providing services and prevent communities from utilising services. Sub-optimal working conditions through rising workloads, insufficient and/or inconsistent resources were frequently reported to impede midwives from providing care in HFS. Uniquely for HFS, threats to the safety and security of midwives to conduct their work was widely reported. Key facilitators identified included, complex adaptive health system designs to respond effectively to the rapidly changing HFS environment, realisation of supporting "power, agency and status" as instrumental for midwives to provide quality care and promotion of community-centric approaches may enable continuity of care and uptake of essential SRMNCAH services. Midwives are critical to protect the health and well-being of communities. They require urgent protection and prioritisation in HFS areas where the need is greatest.

Identifiers

PMID38959267
PMCPMC11221643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.