Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38959231›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Equations for estimating binary mixture toxicity: 3-methyl-2-butanone with a series of electrophiles.

Douglas A Dawson, Terry W Schultz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Douglas A DawsonDepartment of Biological Sciences and Toxicology, Ashland University, Ashland, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5423-4297
Terry W SchultzCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixture toxicity was determined for 32 binary combinations. One chemical was the non-reactive, non-polar narcotic 3-methyl-2-butanone (always chemical A) and the other was a potentially reactive electrophile (chemical B). Bioluminescence inhibition in Allovibrio fischeri was measured at 15-, 30-, and 45-minutes of exposure for A, B, and the mixture (MX). Concentration-response curves (CRCs) were developed for each chemical and used to develop predicted CRCs for the concentration addition (CA) and independent action (IA) mixture toxicity models. Also, MX CRCs were generated and compared with model predictions using the 45-minute data. Classification of observed mixture toxicity used three specific criteria: 1) predicted IA EC50 vs. CA EC50 values at 45-minutes, 2) consistency of 45-minute MX CRC fit to IA, CA, or otherwise at three effect levels (EC25, EC50 and EC75), and 3) the known/suspected mechanism of toxicity for chemical B. Mixture toxicity was then classified into one of seven groupings. As a result of the predicted IA EC50 being more toxic than the predicted CA EC50, IA represented the greater toxic hazard. For this reason, non-sham MXs having toxicity consistent with CA were classified as being "coincident" with CA rather than mechanistically-consistent with CA. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to develop equations that can be used to estimate the toxicity of other 3M2B-containing binary mixtures. These equations were developed from the data for both IA and CA, at each exposure duration and effect level. Each equation had a coefficient of determination (r2) above 0.950 and a variance inflation factor <1.2. This approach can potentially reduce the need for mixture testing and is amenable to other model systems and to assays that evaluate toxicity at low effect levels.

Indexed as

Aliivibrio fischeriButanonesDose-Response Relationship, DrugToxicity TestsButanonesmethylethyl ketone

Identifiers

PMID38959231
PMCPMC11221661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.