Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38959207›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Decrease in reaction time for volleyball athletes during saccadic eye movement task: A preliminary study with evoked potentials.

Élida Costa, Mariana Gongora, Juliana Bittencourt, Victor Marinho, Mauricio Cagy, Silmar Teixeira, Eduardo Nicoliche, Isabelle Fernandes, Caroline Machado, Jacob Wienecke and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07323108 (Investigation of the Effects of Exercises Performed With Stroboscopic Glasses on Athletic Performance in Volleyball Players), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07323108 nacompletednot on this map

Investigation of the Effects of Exercises Performed With Stroboscopic Glasses on Athletic Performance in Volleyball Players

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaskent UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsStroboscopic GlassesArmsstroboscopic visual training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Élida CostaLaboratory of Neurophysiology and Neuropsychology of Attention, Institute of Psychiatry of Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Mariana GongoraBrain Mapping and Sensory Motor Integration Laboratory, Institute of Psychiatry of Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Juliana BittencourtVeiga de Almeida University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Victor MarinhoNeuro-innovation Technology & Brain Mapping Laboratory, Federal University of Delta do Parnaíba, Parnaíba, Brazil.
Mauricio CagyBiomedical Engineering Program, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Silmar TeixeiraNeuro-innovation Technology & Brain Mapping Laboratory, Federal University of Delta do Parnaíba, Parnaíba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9240-1228
Eduardo NicolicheLaboratory of Neurophysiology and Neuropsychology of Attention, Institute of Psychiatry of Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Isabelle FernandesLaboratory of Neurophysiology and Neuropsychology of Attention, Institute of Psychiatry of Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Caroline MachadoLaboratory of Neurophysiology and Neuropsychology of Attention, Institute of Psychiatry of Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jacob WieneckeDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pedro RibeiroSchool of Physical Education and Sport, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Daya S GuptaSchool of Pharmacy, South University, Savannah, Georgia, United States of America.
Bruna VelasquesLaboratory of Neurophysiology and Neuropsychology of Attention, Institute of Psychiatry of Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9363-8932
Henning BuddeFaculty of Human Sciences, Institute for Systems Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3526-0569

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis preliminary study investigated the differences in event-related potential and reaction time under two groups (athletes vs. non-athletes). MATERIAL AND

methodsThe P300 was analyzed for Fz, Cz, and Pz electrodes in thirty-one healthy volunteers divided into two groups (volleyball athletes and non-athletes). In addition, the participants performed a saccadic eye movement task to measure reaction time.

resultsThe EEG analysis showed that the athletes, in comparison to the no-athletes, have differences in the P300 in the frontal area (p = 0.021). In relation to reaction time, the results show lower reaction time for athletes (p = 0.001).

conclusionsThe volleyball athletes may present a greater allocation of attention during the execution of the inhibition task, since they have a lower reaction time for responses when compared to non-athletes.

Indexed as

AthletesElectroencephalographyReaction TimeSaccadesVolleyballAdultAttentionEvent-Related Potentials, P300Evoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38959207
PMCPMC11221644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.