Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38959205›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

The Brief Symptom Inventory in the Swiss general population: Presentation of norm scores and predictors of psychological distress.

Gisela Michel, Julia Baenziger, Jeannette Brodbeck, Luzius Mader, Claudia E Kuehni, Katharina Roser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gisela MichelFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine,tableniversity of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9589-0928
Julia BaenzigerFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine,tableniversity of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Jeannette BrodbeckInstitute of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Luzius MaderFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine,tableniversity of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Claudia E KuehniInstitute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8957-2002
Katharina RoserFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine,tableniversity of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5253-3333

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychological distress is an important and frequent health problem. The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) allows screening for psychological distress in clinical, general and research populations. We aimed to provide normative data for the BSI and the BSI-18 for the Swiss general population: We 1) present psychometric properties, 2) develop a Swiss T-standardization and validate it using a clinical sample, 3) describe psychological distress in the Swiss general population and the clinical sample, and 4) compare the means and T-standardized scores of the Swiss general population to different German norm populations. Using a cross-sectional study design, we invited a representative sample of the Swiss general population aged 18-75 years to the study. A sample of psychotherapy outpatients had competed the BSI before start of their therapy. We calculated scores for the nine scales of the BSI (three of them constitute the BSI-18), the T-standardization and the following BSI indices: Global Severity Index (GSI), Positive Symptom Total (PST), Positive Symptom Distress Index (PSDI), and Caseness (reaching T≥63 on the GSI or T≥63 on at least two of the scales). A total of 1238 general population participants completed the BSI (41.8% male; mean age 48.9 years). The BSI had good psychometric properties. The Swiss T-standardization showed good validity when applied in the clinical sample. Females reached a significantly higher GSI score than males (p<0.001). Older participants (p = 0.026), those with higher education (p <0.001), and those employed or retired (p<0.001) reached lower scores than participants aged 18-25 years, those with compulsory schooling, and unemployed participants, respectively. A total of 18.1% (CI: 16.0-20.5) participants of the general population and 75.2% (CI: 73.7-76.7) of the psychotherapy patients were considered cases with psychological distress. Our study presents detailed normative data for the BSI and the BSI-18 based on a representative sample of the Swiss general population. This information will be helpful for clinical applications and research in the Swiss and international context.

Indexed as

Psychological DistressPsychometricsAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38959205
PMCPMC11221686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.