Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38959057›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Goal-directed vocal planning in a songbird.

Anja T Zai, Anna E Stepien, Nicolas Giret, Richard H R Hahnloser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anja T ZaiNeuroscience Center Zurich (ZNZ), University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0460-0850
Anna E StepienNeuroscience Center Zurich (ZNZ), University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6398-6255
Nicolas GiretInstitut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, UMR 9197 CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Saclay, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7139-6231
Richard H R HahnloserNeuroscience Center Zurich (ZNZ), University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4039-7773

Funding

European Research Council 268911 VOTECOMSwiss National Science Foundation 31003A_156976/1Swiss National Science Foundation 31003A_182638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Songbirds' vocal mastery is impressive, but to what extent is it a result of practice? Can they, based on experienced mismatch with a known target, plan the necessary changes to recover the target in a practice-free manner without intermittently singing? In adult zebra finches, we drive the pitch of a song syllable away from its stable (baseline) variant acquired from a tutor, then we withdraw reinforcement and subsequently deprive them of singing experience by muting or deafening. In this deprived state, birds do not recover their baseline song. However, they revert their songs toward the target by about 1 standard deviation of their recent practice, provided the sensory feedback during the latter signaled a pitch mismatch with the target. Thus, targeted vocal plasticity does not require immediate sensory experience, showing that zebra finches are capable of goal-directed vocal planning.

Indexed as

FinchesGoalsVocalization, AnimalAnimalsMaleauditory feedbackbirdsongneurosciencereinforcement learningvocal learningzebra finch

Identifiers

PMID38959057
PMCPMC11221833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.