ArticleJAMA network open2024
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signs of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- 'Man vs. Machine: can ML algorithms diagnose headaches as accurately as clinicians? A systematic review.'Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- MRI-based evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and optic nerve subarachnoid space alterations in idiopathic intracranial hypertension and normal tension glaucoma: a systematic review.BMC medical imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Cerebral venous blood flow regulates intracerebral pressure and brain clearance via meningeal lymphatic vessels.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Interpretation of increased intracranial pressure findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging in headache patients.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Is Characterized by a Distinct Proteomic Profile.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension with and Without Papilledema: A Comparative Cohort Study.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- MRI features in atypical idiopathic intracranial hypertension.European radiology · 2026Article
- Idiopathic ıntracranial hypertension: diagnostic contribution of novel MRI parameters and their relationship with CSF pressure.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Article
- Idiopathic intracranial hypertension exacerbated by aseptic meningitis from a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of machine-learning using conventional magnetic resonance imaging markers for pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a retrospective study.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Review
- Neuroimaging outcomes in suspected papilledema.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Microstructural White Matter Alterations in Pediatric Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2025Article
- Patterns of Retinal Damage and Visual Long-Term Consequences in Patients With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.Neurology · 2025Article
- A Prospective Multicenter Study on the Evaluation of Frequency of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension in Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Observational
- Cervical Oculopathy: The Cervical Spine Etiology of Visual Symptoms and Eye Diseases-A Hypothesis Exploring Mechanisms Linking the Neck and the Eye.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Accuracy of intracranial pressure assessment with a non-invasive transcranial doppler and arterial blood pressure method in patients with suspected idiopathic intracranial hypertension.The ultrasound journal · 2025Article
- Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2025Article
- Metabolic Dysfunction in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Current Theories and Updates.Aging and disease · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byBeyond the2025
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria currently used to diagnose idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) are based on expert opinion and have limited accuracy. Additional neuroimaging signs have been proposed and used with contradictory results; thus, prospective evidence is needed to improve diagnostic accuracy. Objective: To provide evidence-based, accurate MRI signs for IIH diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study was conducted from January 2018 to May 2021 with 3 validation cohorts at 2 Danish headache centers and with 3 independent international cohorts. Consecutive patients with suspected IIH were enrolled. Eligibility required the clinical suspicion of IIH, age 18 years or older, and written informed consent. The validation cohorts comprised patients with confirmed IIH from Austria and the US, and patients without IIH from the US. Data analysis was performed from December 2021 to August 2023. Exposure: Standardized diagnostic workup was performed to classify cases according to current criteria, and blinded evaluation of cerebral radiological diagnostics and papilledema was performed. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were MRI signs associated with IIH as assessed by univariate analyses. An MRI score estimating papilledema was calculated using machine learning. Internal validation of associations with lumbar puncture opening pressure and outcome and external validation of accuracy were performed in 3 cohorts. Results: Of 192 eligible patients (185 women [96.4%]; median [IQR] age, 28.0 [23.0-35.0] years), 110 were classified as having IIH, 4 as having probable IIH, and 1 as having suspected IIH without papilledema; 77 did not have IIH and served as controls, with corresponding age, sex, and weight. Papilledema at diagnosis was associated with perioptic subarachnoid space distension (56 patients [68.3%] vs 21 patients [41.2%]), posterior globe flattening (53 patients [66.3%] vs 10 patients [21.3%]), optic nerve disc protrusion (35 patients [30.4%] vs 2 patients [2.3%]), and transverse sinus venous stenosis (75 patients [79.8%] vs 29 patients [46.8%]). The papilledema-estimating MRI score showed optimal balance between sensitivity (49%) and specificity (87%) when 2 of the 3 latter signs were present and was associated with the lumbar puncture opening pressure and ophthalmological outcome. The score showed strong diagnostic accuracy in the external validation cohorts (587 patients; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.86) and outperformed the current (2013) diagnostic MRI criteria. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study of patients with IIH and controls suggest that an evidence-based MRI score including posterior globe flattening, optic nerve disc protrusion, and transverse sinus stenosis can estimate the presence of papilledema more accurately than the current diagnostic criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.