Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38958974›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signs of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Dagmar Beier, Johanne Juhl Korsbæk, Gabriel Bsteh, Stefan Macher, Wolfgang Marik, Berthold Pemp, Hsiangkuo Yuan, Areeba Nisar, Lisbeth Høgedal, Laleh Dehghani Molander and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evaluation of Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Dagmar BeierDepartment of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Johanne Juhl KorsbækDanish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gabriel BstehDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan MacherDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang MarikComprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Berthold PempDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hsiangkuo YuanJefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Areeba NisarJefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lisbeth HøgedalDepartment of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Laleh Dehghani MolanderDepartment of Ophthalmology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Snorre Malm HagenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christoph Patrick BeierDepartment of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Simon Bang KristensenOPEN, Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Rigmor Højland JensenDanish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria currently used to diagnose idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) are based on expert opinion and have limited accuracy. Additional neuroimaging signs have been proposed and used with contradictory results; thus, prospective evidence is needed to improve diagnostic accuracy. Objective: To provide evidence-based, accurate MRI signs for IIH diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study was conducted from January 2018 to May 2021 with 3 validation cohorts at 2 Danish headache centers and with 3 independent international cohorts. Consecutive patients with suspected IIH were enrolled. Eligibility required the clinical suspicion of IIH, age 18 years or older, and written informed consent. The validation cohorts comprised patients with confirmed IIH from Austria and the US, and patients without IIH from the US. Data analysis was performed from December 2021 to August 2023. Exposure: Standardized diagnostic workup was performed to classify cases according to current criteria, and blinded evaluation of cerebral radiological diagnostics and papilledema was performed. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were MRI signs associated with IIH as assessed by univariate analyses. An MRI score estimating papilledema was calculated using machine learning. Internal validation of associations with lumbar puncture opening pressure and outcome and external validation of accuracy were performed in 3 cohorts. Results: Of 192 eligible patients (185 women [96.4%]; median [IQR] age, 28.0 [23.0-35.0] years), 110 were classified as having IIH, 4 as having probable IIH, and 1 as having suspected IIH without papilledema; 77 did not have IIH and served as controls, with corresponding age, sex, and weight. Papilledema at diagnosis was associated with perioptic subarachnoid space distension (56 patients [68.3%] vs 21 patients [41.2%]), posterior globe flattening (53 patients [66.3%] vs 10 patients [21.3%]), optic nerve disc protrusion (35 patients [30.4%] vs 2 patients [2.3%]), and transverse sinus venous stenosis (75 patients [79.8%] vs 29 patients [46.8%]). The papilledema-estimating MRI score showed optimal balance between sensitivity (49%) and specificity (87%) when 2 of the 3 latter signs were present and was associated with the lumbar puncture opening pressure and ophthalmological outcome. The score showed strong diagnostic accuracy in the external validation cohorts (587 patients; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.86) and outperformed the current (2013) diagnostic MRI criteria. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study of patients with IIH and controls suggest that an evidence-based MRI score including posterior globe flattening, optic nerve disc protrusion, and transverse sinus stenosis can estimate the presence of papilledema more accurately than the current diagnostic criteria.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPapilledemaPseudotumor CerebriAdultCohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID38958974
PMCPMC11223000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.