ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2025
The effect of calcium oxalate stones and uric acid stones on male sexual function.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study compared the effects of calcium oxalate stones and uric acid stones on male sexual function.
methodsWe enrolled 100 patients with ureteral stones. According to the composition of the stones, they were divided into the calcium oxalate stone group and the uric acid stone group. All patients underwent ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy. General data such as age, body mass index, course of disease, stone diameter, and degree of renal hydronephrosis were compared. Sperm parameters, including sperm density, sperm viability, and sperm deformity rate, as well as International Index of Erectile Function-5 questionnaire (IIEF-5) scores, and Quality of Life (QOL) scores, were measured and compared before and 6 weeks after the surgery.
resultsThere were no statistically significant differences in general data and sperm parameters between the two groups before the surgery (P > 0.05). However, there were significantly lower IIEF scores but significantly higher QOL scores in the uric acid stone group. In the calcium oxalate stone group, there were no statistically significant differences in sperm parameters, IIEF score, and QOL score before and after the surgery (P > 0.05). In the uric acid stone group, there were no statistically significant differences in sperm parameters before and after surgery (P > 0.05), whereas there were significantly higher IIEF scores but significantly lower QOL scores after the surgery (P < 0.05). The prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) in the uric acid stone group was 38.18% (21/55), which was significantly higher compared to 20.00% (9/45) in the calcium oxalate stone group (P < 0.05). The multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that the independent risk factor related to ED was uric acid stones (odds ratio: 2.637, 95% confidence interval 1.040-6.689, P = 0.041). No statistically significant differences were found in sperm parameters between patients with and without ED.
conclusionCompared with the calcium oxalate stone group, patients with uric acid stones had a higher prevalence of ED and poorer sexual performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38958853What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.