Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38958849›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2024

Artificial intelligence innovations in neurosurgical oncology: a narrative review.

Clayton R Baker, Matthew Pease, Daniel P Sexton, Andrew Abumoussa, Lola B Chambless

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Clayton R BakerVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA. clayton.r.baker@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9186-4495
Matthew PeaseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6125-9858
Daniel P SextonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0403-2574
Andrew AbumoussaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lola B ChamblessDepartment of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeArtificial Intelligence (AI) has become increasingly integrated clinically within neurosurgical oncology. This report reviews the cutting-edge technologies impacting tumor treatment and outcomes.

methodsA rigorous literature search was performed with the aid of a research librarian to identify key articles referencing AI and related topics (machine learning (ML), computer vision (CV), augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), etc.) for neurosurgical care of brain or spinal tumors.

resultsTreatment of central nervous system (CNS) tumors is being improved through advances across AI-such as AL, CV, and AR/VR. AI aided diagnostic and prognostication tools can influence pre-operative patient experience, while automated tumor segmentation and total resection predictions aid surgical planning. Novel intra-operative tools can rapidly provide histopathologic tumor classification to streamline treatment strategies. Post-operative video analysis, paired with rich surgical simulations, can enhance training feedback and regimens.

conclusionWhile limited generalizability, bias, and patient data security are current concerns, the advent of federated learning, along with growing data consortiums, provides an avenue for increasingly safe, powerful, and effective AI platforms in the future.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeurosurgical ProceduresBrain NeoplasmsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsHumansMedical OncologyNeurosurgeryArtificial intelligence (AI)Augmented / virtual reality (AR/VR)Brain tumorComputer vision (CV)Machine learning (ML)Neurosurgery

Identifiers

PMID38958849
PMCPMC11341589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.