Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38958848›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2024

Application of 5T glutamate chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging in brain tumors: preliminary results.

Jie Zhou, Wenbo Sun, Huan Li, Xiaopeng Song, Dan Xu, Haibo Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jie Zhou *Department of Radiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Wenbo Sun *Department of Radiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Huan LiDepartment of Radiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xiaopeng SongCentral Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare, 2258 Chengbei Rd., Jiading District, Shanghai, 201807, China.
Dan XuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. xudan942004@whu.edu.cn.
Haibo XuDepartment of Radiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. xuhaibo@whu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China no. 82271960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGlutamate chemical exchange saturation transfer (GluCEST) is a non-invasive CEST imaging technique for detecting glutamate levels in tissues. We aimed to investigate the reproducibility of the 5T GluCEST technique in healthy volunteers and preliminarily explore its potential clinical application in patients with brain tumors.

methodsTen volunteers (4 males, mean age 29 years) underwent three 5T GluCEST imaging scans. The reproducibility of the three imaging GluCEST measurements was assessed using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), generalized estimating equations, and linear mixed models. Twenty-eight patients with brain tumors (10 males, mean age 54 years) underwent a single GluCEST scan preoperatively, and t-tests were used to compare the differences in GluCEST values between different brain tumors. In addition, the diagnostic accuracy of GluCEST values in differentiating brain tumors was assessed using the receiver work characteristics (ROC) curve.

resultsThe coefficients of variation of GluCEST values in healthy volunteers were less than 5% for intra-day, inter-day, and within-subjects and less than 10% for between-subjects. High-grade gliomas (HGG) had higher GluCEST values compared to low-grade gliomas (LGG) (P < 0.001). In addition, cerebellopontine angle (CPA) meningiomas had higher GluCEST values than acoustic neuromas (P < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of the GluCEST value for differentiating CPA meningioma from acoustic neuroma was 0.93.

conclusion5T GluCEST images are highly reproducible in healthy brains. In addition, the 5T GluCEST technique has potential clinical applications in differentiating LGG from HGG and CPA meningiomas from acoustic neuromas.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlutamic AcidMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedBrainFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMeningiomaMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveYoung AdultGlutamic Acid5.0T MRIAcoustic neuromaGliomaGluCESTMeningioma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.