Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38958736›Full record

ArticlePathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[New edition of the Paris classification 2022: What is new?]

Tatjana Vlajnic, Lukas Bubendorf

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tatjana VlajnicPathologie, Institut für medizinische Genetik und Pathologie, Universitätsspital Basel, Schönbeinstr. 40, 4031, Basel, Schweiz. Tatjana.Vlajnic@usb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1067-6771
Lukas BubendorfPathologie, Institut für medizinische Genetik und Pathologie, Universitätsspital Basel, Schönbeinstr. 40, 4031, Basel, Schweiz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As an internationally accepted diagnostic system, the Paris classification has achieved a global breakthrough in the standardization of diagnoses in urine cytology. Based on experience over the past few years since its first publication, the new edition of the Paris classification refines the diagnostic criteria and discusses diagnostic pitfalls. While the detection of high-grade urothelial carcinoma remains the main focus, other aspects of urine cytology, including cytology of the upper urinary tract and the associated challenges, have also been addressed. Low-grade urothelial neoplasia is no longer listed as a separate category but is now included in the category "negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma" (NGHUC). Essentially, the Paris classification provides an important basis for estimating the risk of malignancy and further clinical management.

Indexed as

UrineUrologic NeoplasmsHumansUpper urinary tractUrinary tractUrinary tract cytologyUrine cytologyUrothelial neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID38958736
PMCPMC11511721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.