Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38958719›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024

Artificial intelligence automated surgical phases recognition in intraoperative videos of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy.

Jiaying You, He Cai, Yuxian Wang, Ang Bian, Ke Cheng, Lingwei Meng, Xin Wang, Pan Gao, Sirui Chen, Yunqiang Cai and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. [Clinical Practice and Quality Control Strategies for Complex Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jiaying YouWestChina-California Research Center for Predictive Intervention, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, China.
He CaiDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Sichuan University West China Hospital, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yuxian WangChengdu Withai Innovations Technology Company, Chengdu, China.
Ang BianCollege of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ke ChengDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Sichuan University West China Hospital, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Lingwei MengDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Sichuan University West China Hospital, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Xin WangDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Sichuan University West China Hospital, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Pan GaoDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Sichuan University West China Hospital, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Sirui ChenMianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, China.
Yunqiang CaiDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Sichuan University West China Hospital, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China. yunqiangcaiwch@163.com.
Bing PengDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Sichuan University West China Hospital, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China. pengbhx@scu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) is one of the most challenging operations and has a long learning curve. Artificial intelligence (AI) automated surgical phase recognition in intraoperative videos has many potential applications in surgical education, helping shorten the learning curve, but no study has made this breakthrough in LPD. Herein, we aimed to build AI models to recognize the surgical phase in LPD and explore the performance characteristics of AI models.

methodsAmong 69 LPD videos from a single surgical team, we used 42 in the building group to establish the models and used the remaining 27 videos in the analysis group to assess the models' performance characteristics. We annotated 13 surgical phases of LPD, including 4 key phases and 9 necessary phases. Two minimal invasive pancreatic surgeons annotated all the videos. We built two AI models for the key phase and necessary phase recognition, based on convolutional neural networks. The overall performance of the AI models was determined mainly by mean average precision (mAP).

resultsOverall mAPs of the AI models in the test set of the building group were 89.7% and 84.7% for key phases and necessary phases, respectively. In the 27-video analysis group, overall mAPs were 86.8% and 71.2%, with maximum mAPs of 98.1% and 93.9%. We found commonalities between the error of model recognition and the differences of surgeon annotation, and the AI model exhibited bad performance in cases with anatomic variation or lesion involvement with adjacent organs.

conclusionsAI automated surgical phase recognition can be achieved in LPD, with outstanding performance in selective cases. This breakthrough may be the first step toward AI- and video-based surgical education in more complex surgeries.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLaparoscopyPancreaticoduodenectomyVideo RecordingHumansLearning CurveArtificial intelligenceIntraoperative videoLaparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomySurgical data scienceSurgical phase recognitionVideo analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.