Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38958695›Full record

Observational studyEuropean radiology2024

Diagnostic MRI for deep pelvic endometriosis: towards a standardized protocol?

Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Christine Sadjo Zoua, Marc Bazot, Michele Monroc, Horace Roman, Léo Razakamanantsoa, Pascal Rousset, ENDOVALIRM study group

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Isabelle Thomassin-NaggaraRadiology Imaging and Interventional Radiology Specialized Department (IRIS), Tenon Hospital, Public Hospital of Paris, Paris, France. isabelle.thomassin@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0919-0133
Christine Sadjo ZouaRadiology Imaging and Interventional Radiology Specialized Department (IRIS), Tenon Hospital, Public Hospital of Paris, Paris, France.
Marc BazotRadiology Imaging and Interventional Radiology Specialized Department (IRIS), Tenon Hospital, Public Hospital of Paris, Paris, France.
Michele MonrocDepartment of Radiology, Clinique Saint-Antoine, Bois-Guillaume, France.
Horace RomanIFEMEndo, Clinique Tivoli-Ducos, Bordeaux, France.
Léo RazakamanantsoaRadiology Imaging and Interventional Radiology Specialized Department (IRIS), Tenon Hospital, Public Hospital of Paris, Paris, France.
Pascal RoussetDepartment of Radiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Pierre Bénite, France.
ENDOVALIRM study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the diagnostic efficacy of an MRI protocol and patient preparation in detecting deep pelvic endometriosis (DPE). MATERIAL AND

methodsThe cohort is from the ENDOVALIRM database, a multicentric national retrospective study involving women who underwent MRI followed by pelvic surgery for endometriosis (reference standard). Two senior radiologists independently analyzed MRI findings using the deep pelvic endometriosis index (dPEI) to determine lesion locations. The study evaluated the impact of bowel preparation, vaginal and rectal opacification, MRI unit type (1.5-T or 3-T), additional sequences (thin slice T2W or 3DT2W), and gadolinium injection on reader performance for diagnosing DPE locations. Fisher's exact test assessed differences in diagnostic accuracy based on patient preparation and MRI parameters.

resultsThe final cohort comprised 571 women with a mean age of 33.3 years (± 6.6 SD). MRI with bowel preparation outperformed MRI without bowel preparation in identifying torus/uterosacral ligament (USL) locations (p < 0.0001) and rectosigmoid nodules (p = 0.01). MRI without vaginal opacification diagnosed 94.1% (301/320) of torus/USL locations, surpassing MR with vaginal opacification, which diagnosed 85% (221/260) (p < 0.001). No significant differences related to bowel preparation or vaginal opacification were observed for other DPE locations. Rectal opacification did not affect diagnostic accuracy in the overall population, except in patients without bowel preparation, where performance improved (p = 0.04). There were no differences in diagnostic accuracy regarding MRI unit type (1.5-T/3-T), presence of additional sequences, or gadolinium injection for any endometriotic locations.

conclusionBowel preparation prior to MRI examination is preferable to rectal or vaginal opacification for diagnosing deep endometriosis pelvic lesions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Accurate diagnosis and staging of DPE are essential for effective treatment planning. Bowel preparation should be prioritized over rectal or vaginal opacification in MRI protocols. Optimizing MRI protocols for diagnostic performance with appropriate opacification techniques will help diagnose deep endometriosis more accurately. KEY POINTS: Evaluating deep endometriosis in collapsible organs such as the vagina and rectum is difficult. Bowel preparation and an absence of vaginal opacification were found to be diagnostically beneficial. Bowel preparation should be prioritized over rectal or vaginal opacification in MRI protocols.

Indexed as

EndometriosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultContrast MediaFemaleHumansPelvisRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaDiagnosticEndometriosisMagnetic resonance imagingProtocol

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.