ReviewmSphere2024
Going fishing: how to get what you want from a fungal genetic screen.
Review in mSphere, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role ofmBio · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Five years ago, as I was starting my lab, I wrote about two functional genomic screens in fungi that had inspired me (mSphere 4:e00299-19, https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00299-19). Now, I want to discuss some of the principles and questions that I ask myself and my students as we embark on our own screens. A good screen, whether it is a genetic or chemical screen, can be the starting point for new discovery and an excellent basis for the beginning of a scientific research project. However, screens are often criticized for being "fishing expeditions." To stretch this metaphor to the extreme, this is because people are worried that we do not know how to fish, that we will come home without any fish, bring home the wrong fish, or not know what to do with a fish if we caught it. How you set up the screen and analyze the results determines whether the screen will be useful. In this mini-review, and in the spirit of teaching a scientist to fish, I will discuss recent excellent fungal genetic and chemical screens that illustrate some of the key aspects of a successful screen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.