Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38958420›Full record

ArticleAMA journal of ethics2024

When Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder Gets Disrupted by Extra-Clinical Variables, How Should Clinicians Respond?

Taleed El-Sabawi, Kelly Gillespie

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in AMA journal of ethics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Taleed El-SabawiAssistant professor of law at Florida International University College of Law in Miami.
Kelly GillespieProfessor of law and professor of health care ethics (secondary appointment) at Saint Louis University in St Louis, Missouri.

Funding

The Influence of Public Health Infrastructure on Prosecutorial Responses to the Opioid CrisisK01DA057414 · NIDA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Taleed El-Sabawi · 2023 to 2026
$672k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA057414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural and systemic discrimination against people with substance use disorder is pervasive. Clinicians caring for patients receiving medications for opioid use disorders (MOUDs) should plan for possible disruptions of treatment caused by arrests and pretrial confinement in jails. This case commentary suggests that harms caused by such treatment disruption can be mitigated by clinicians who take some of the practical approaches outlined in this commentary to better preserve continuity of care for people receiving MOUD.

Indexed as

Opiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersAdultAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineContinuity of Patient CareHumansMaleAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphine

Identifiers

PMID38958420
PMCPMC11293620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.