Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38958049›Full record

SynthesisInfectious diseases (London, England)2024

Prevention of sexual transmission of mpox: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of approaches.

Sara Paparini, Isabelle Whelan, Chikondi Mwendera, Rosalie Hayes, Ismael Maatouk, Rosamund Lewis, Mateo Prochazka Nunez, Antons Mozalevskis, Teodora Wi, Chloe Orkin

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Infectious diseases (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sara PapariniSHARE Collaborative, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Isabelle WhelanSHARE Collaborative, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Chikondi MwenderaInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Rosalie HayesSHARE Collaborative, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Ismael MaatoukDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rosamund LewisHealth Emergencies Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mateo Prochazka NunezDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Antons MozalevskisDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Teodora WiDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Chloe OrkinSHARE Collaborative, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ongoing multi-country mpox outbreak in previously unaffected countries is primarily affecting sexual networks of men who have sex with men. Evidence is needed on the effectiveness of recommended preventive interventions. To inform WHO guidelines, a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis were conducted on mpox preventive behavioural interventions to reduce: (i) sexual acquisition; (ii) onward sexual transmission from confirmed/probable cases; and (iii) utility of asymptomatic testing.

methodsMedline, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane and WHO trial databases, grey literature and conferences were searched for English-language primary research published since 1 January 2022. A reviewer team performed screening, data extraction and bias assessment. A qualitative thematic synthesis explored views and experiences of engagement in prevention in individuals at increased risk.

resultsThere were 16 studies: 1 on contact-tracing, 2 on sexual behaviour, and 13 on asymptomatic testing. Although MPXV was detected in varying proportions of samples (0.17%-6.5%), the testing studies provide insufficient evidence to fully evaluate this strategy. For the qualitative evidence synthesis, four studies evaluated the experiences of most affected communities. Preferences about preventive interventions were shaped by: mpox information; the diversity of sexual practices; accessibility and quality of mpox testing and care; and perceived cost to wellbeing.

conclusionsEvidence on the effectiveness of interventions to prevent the sexual transmission of mpox remains scarce. Limited qualitative evidence on values and preferences provides insight into factors influencing intervention acceptability. Given global and local inequities in access to vaccines and treatment, further research is needed to establish the effectiveness of additional interventions.

Indexed as

Sexual BehaviorContact TracingDisease OutbreaksHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMpox, MonkeypoxQualitative ResearchSexually Transmitted Diseasesmen who have sex with menMpoxMPXVpreventionsexual transmission

Identifiers

PMID38958049
PMCPMC11229790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.