Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38957989›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2024

Guidelines for designing and interpreting drought experiments in controlled conditions.

Menachem Moshelion, Karl-Josef Dietz, Ian C Dodd, Bertrand Muller, John E Lunn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Drought Response in the Transcriptome and Ionome of Wild and DomesticatedPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Menachem MoshelionThe Robert H. Smith Institute of Plant Sciences and Genetics in Agriculture, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0156-2884
Karl-Josef DietzDepartment of Biochemistry and Physiology, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 25, D-33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Ian C DoddLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK.
Bertrand MullerINRAE-LEPSE, Institut Agro, Université Montpellier, UMR 759 Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environnementaux, 34060 Montpellier, France.
John E LunnMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Mühlenberg 1, D-14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

DroughtsResearch DesignGuidelines as TopicConsensus-driven terminologydrought experimentsexperimental design flawsgenotype×environment interactionsirrigation controlplant-environment interactionswhole-plant transpiration

Identifiers

PMID38957989
PMCPMC11350075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.