ArticleCureus2024
Correlation of the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 Score With Post-operative Complications in Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Oncosurgeries.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between nutrition-focused evidence-based nursing and post-operative nutritional status in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Post-Cholecystectomy nutritional management: a comprehensive review of evidence-based guidelines and clinical practice.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Malnutrition as an independent risk factor for fluoropyrimidine- and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy-induced cardiovascular toxicity in colorectal cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Nutritional Status and Nutritional Support in Patients with Gastrointestinal Diseases.Nutrients · 2025Article
- The association between nutritional risk and survival time among patients with pancreatic cancer following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Value analysis of preoperative NRS2002 and GLIM screening in predicting postoperative complications in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) is a reliable tool for assessing patients' nutritional status and for identifying those who may benefit from nutritional support before undergoing surgery. However, its application and correlation with post-operative outcomes for Nepalese patients undergoing gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary oncosurgeries remain unexplored. The objective of this study was to correlate the NRS 2002's nutritional risk with post-operative complications classified by the Clavien-Dindo Classification. Methods A prospective analytical study was conducted at Kathmandu Medical College and Teaching Hospital, with 74 adults who underwent gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary oncosurgeries between 1st March 2021 and 30th August 2022. The study was conducted following ethical clearance from the Institutional Review Committee of the Hospital. A convenience sampling method was used. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20 (Released 2011; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). Results Among the 122 patients admitted during the study period, 74 met the inclusion criteria. Using the NRS-2002, 37.8% were found to be at nutritional risk. Such patients had a higher risk of complications and extended hospital stays, supported by an odds ratio of 1.647 (95% confidence interval: 1.223 -2.219) and a p-value of <0.001. Nutritional risk emerged as an independent predictor of post-operative complications. Conclusion The study suggests the potential of NRS-2002 as a significant predictor of outcomes after surgeries for gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary malignancies in the South Asian context, particularly in Nepal. Tools such as NRS 2002 play a pivotal role in early risk identification, which could subsequently influence both pre-operative and post-operative care strategies, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.