Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38957829›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

The Utility of Radiologic Imaging and Full Body Skin Examination in Patients With Melanoma of Unknown Primary.

Parisa ShamaeiZadeh, Elliott Campbell, Nneka Comfere

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Parisa ShamaeiZadehDermatology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, USA.
Elliott CampbellDermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Nneka ComfereLaboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although most melanomas have a cutaneous origin, melanomas are rarely discovered without an overt primary site and are found in the metastatic stage. This phenomenon is called melanoma of unknown primary (MUP), which was first recorded in 1963.Melanoma can also rarely present as tumoral melanosis, which has completely regressed. By definition, this does not have viable melanocytes and histologically presents as an infiltration of melanophages and melanin. A 71-year-old female presented for dermatologic evaluation after being found to have melanoma of unknown primary (MUP). The MUP, located in multiple lymph nodes of the left superior and inferior inguinal region, was found on preoperative imaging indicated for surgical management of endometrial carcinoma. After the biopsy, a positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan was performed to determine the extent of involvement, which noted focal uptake of the left heel of just medial to midline with an SUV max of 2.1. Based on the PET-CT findings, the patient was questioned about the lesion on her heel. She had suspected this was due to friction and stated it had been asymptomatic and present for years. This unique case demonstrates that combined total skin examination and whole-body radiologic imaging (preferably PET-CT) are both critical elements in the evaluation of MUP. Since melanoma of unknown primary is at least American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8 Stage III (due to N1 status), imaging is reasonable in these patients.

Indexed as

dermatologymelanomamelanoma of unknown primarypet-cttumoral melanosis

Identifiers

PMID38957829
PMCPMC11218534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.