ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating the Anterior Loop of the Mental Nerve Using Cone Beam CT Scans in the Jordanian Population.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Implications of the Localization and Morphological Variability of the Mental Foramen-A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Anatomical and CBCT-Based Evaluation of the Mental Foramen in Korean Adults: Clinical Implications for Implant Surgery and Mental Nerve Block.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionKnowledge of anatomical landmarks is crucial for effective dental treatments, especially in surgical procedures. The mental nerve (MN), a branch of the inferior alveolar nerve, features a critical landmark known as the anterior loop (AL), often overlooked by surgeons. This study aims to assess the occurrence of the MN AL, its type, and its length within a sample of the Jordanian population by utilizing cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.
methodsThis retrospective observational study included the acquisition of CBCT images from a total of randomly selected 268 patients who sought treatment for a range of dental conditions (such as tooth extraction, orthodontic therapy, and dental implants) at hospitals affiliated with the Jordanian Royal Medical Services. Reformatted images were utilized to detect the AL type, length, and the association between the nerve type and mental foramen (MF) position.
resultsThis study involved 268 patients. The distribution of MF positions and the characteristics of the inferior dental nerve were evaluated, with no significant gender differences observed. The predominant location for the MF in both males and females in both sides was position IV, with 52% of females and 56-59% (left-right sides) of males presenting this trait. The inferior dental nerve types also showed no significant gender variation, with 42-43% (left-right sides) of females having type III and a similar distribution among males. Measurements of the midline-mental foramen and inter-foramen distances revealed slight variations between genders, with significant differences noted in the right AL length for type III nerves, favoring males (p=0.034). A notable correlation was found between the type of inferior dental nerve and the MF position, particularly with type I nerves predominantly associating with position IV mental foramina (p≤0.004).
conclusionCBCT scans are essential in the precise evaluation of the AL, aiding in the prevention of nerve injuries during dental procedures. Our results highlight the diversity of the AL in the Jordanian population and the importance of individualized treatment plans. Future research with larger cohorts is advised to refine these insights, aiming to improve treatment outcomes and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.