ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Machine learning for screening and predicting the availability of medications for children: a cross-sectional survey study.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to explore the factors influencing the availability of medications for children, and establish a machine learning model to provide an empirical basis for the subsequent formulation and improvement of relevant policies. Methods: Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: 12 provinces, China. Medical doctors from 25 public hospitals were enrolled. All data were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7:3. Three prediction models, namely random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were developed and compared. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and the associated area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the three models. A nomogram and clinical impact curve (CIC) for availability of medication were developed. Results: Fifteen of 29 factors in the database that were most likely to be selected were considered to establish the prediction model. The XGBoost model (AUC = 0.915) demonstrated better performance than the RF model (AUC = 0.902) and the LR model (AUC = 0.890). According to the Shapley additive explanation values, the five factors that most significantly affected the availability of medications for children in the XGboost model were as follows: the relatively small number of specialized dosage forms for children; unaffordable medications for children; public education on the accessibility and safety of medication for children; uneven distribution of medical resources, leading to insufficient access to medication for children; and years of service as a doctor. The CIC was used to assess the practical applicability of the factor prediction nomogram. Conclusions: The XGBoost model can be used to establish a prediction model to screen the factors associated with the availability of medications for children. The most important contributing factors to the models were the following: the relatively small number of specialized dosage forms for children; unaffordable medications for children; public education on the accessibility and safety of medication for children; uneven distribution of medical resources, leading to insufficient access to medication for children; and years of service as a doctor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.