ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Atlantoaxial subluxation and Down syndrome: A cross-sectional analysis.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical management strategies for atlantoaxial instability/dislocation in down syndrome.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) is a diagnosis describing misalignment of the C1 vertebra relative to C2. Excessive translation of this joint, located adjacent to the medullary brain stem, can lead to devastating neurological consequences. A higher prevalence of AAS within the Down syndrome (DS) population has been well-established. This study aims to establish a prevalence rate of DS in patients hospitalized for AAS and compare outcomes between AAS patients with and without DS. Methods: This study utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) provided by the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). In accordance with HCUP 2023 Clinical Classifications Software Refined files, data were queried using the International Classification of Diseases 10 Results: Of the 213,095 patients in the NIS database admitted between 2016 and 2020 with AAS as their primary diagnosis, 7.2% were DS patients. DS patients were significantly younger (26.56 ± 20.81 vs. 49.39 ± 27.63, Conclusion: This large-scale study using NIS data determined that 7.2% of all patients admitted to hospitals for AAS are DS patients. The analysis of demographics, hospital course, and outcomes can influence the development of treatment protocols for AAS in the DS population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.