Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38957769›Full record

ReviewJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine

A systematic review of risk factors and adverse outcomes associated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery over the past decade.

Vikramaditya Rai, Vipin Sharma, Mukesh Kumar, Lokesh Thakur

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vikramaditya RaiDepartment of Orthopedics, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College and Hospital, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Vipin SharmaDepartment of Orthopedics, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College and Hospital, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Mukesh KumarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College and Hospital, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Lokesh ThakurDepartment of Orthopedics, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College and Hospital, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most frequently performed cervical surgeries in the world, yet there have been several reported complications. Objective: To determine the actual incidence of complications related to ACDF as well as any risk variables that may have been identified in earlier research. Methods: To evaluate the origin, presentation, natural history, and management of the risks and the complications, we conducted a thorough assessment of the pertinent literature. An evaluation of clinical trials and case studies of patients who experienced one or more complications following ACDF surgery was done using a PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar search. Studies involving adult human subjects that were written in the English language and published between 2012 and 2022 were included in the search. The search yielded 79 studies meeting our criteria. Results: The overall rates of complications were as follows: Dysphagia 7.9%, psudarthrosis 5.8%, adjacent segment disease (ASD) 8.8%, esophageal perforations (EPs) 0.5%, graft or hardware failure 2.2%, infection 0.3%, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy 1.7%, cerebrospinal fluid leak 0.8%, Horner syndrome 0.5%, hematoma 0.8%, and C5 palsy 1.9%. Conclusion: Results showed that dysphagia was a common postoperative sequelae with bone morphogenetic protein use and a higher number of surgical levels being the major risk factors. Pseudarthrosis rates varied depending on the factors such as asymptomatic radiographic graft sinking, neck pain, or radiculopathy necessitating revision surgery. The incidence of ASD indicated no data to support anterior cervical plating as more effective than standalone ACDF. EP was rare but frequently fatal, with no correlation found between patient age, sex, body mass index, operation time, or number of levels.

Indexed as

Anterior cervical fusionanterior platecervical spinecervical spine diseasediscectomystand-alone cage

Identifiers

PMID38957769
PMCPMC11216642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.