ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Perioperative and safety outcomes following tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion to revise a pseudarthrosis: A multicenter retrospective review of 150 cases.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Implementation of Tissue-Sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion: Addressing Market Access Challenges.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Posterior cervical fusion (PCF) with lateral mass screws is a favorable treatment option to revise a symptomatic pseudarthrosis due to reliable rates of arthrodesis; however, this technique introduces elevated risk for wound infection and hospital readmission. A tissue-sparing PCF approach involving facet fixation instrumentation reduces the rates of postoperative complications while stabilizing the symptomatic level to achieve arthrodesis; however, these outcomes have been limited to small study cohorts from individual surgeons commonly with mixed indications for treatment. Materials and Methods: One hundred and fifty cases were identified from a retrospective chart review performed by seven surgeons across six sites in the United States. All cases involved PCF revision for a pseudarthrosis at one or more levels from C3 to C7 following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). PCF was performed using a tissue-sparing technique with facet instrumentation. Cases involving additional supplemental fixation such as lateral mass screws, rods, wires, or other hardware were excluded. Demographics, operative notes, postoperative complications, hospital readmission, and subsequent surgical interventions were summarized as an entire cohort and according to the following risk factors: age, sex, number of levels revised, body mass index (BMI), and history of nicotine use. Results: The average age of patients at the time of PCF revision was 55 ± 11 years and 63% were female. The average BMI was 29 ± 6 kg/m Conclusions: This chart review of perioperative and safety outcomes provides evidence in support of tissue-sparing PCF with facet instrumentation as a treatment for symptomatic pseudarthrosis after ACDF. The most common locations requiring revision were the caudal and cranial levels. Operative duration and estimated blood loss were favorable when compared to open alternatives. There were no instances of postoperative wound infection, and the majority of patients were discharged the day following surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.