Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38957721›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

Revenue Cycle Management: The Art and the Science.

Rajiv Chandawarkar, Prakash Nadkarni, Elizabeth Barmash, Stephany Thomas, Allison Capek, Kathleen Casey, Freddy Carradero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Financing a Private Practice: A Practical Framework for Plastic Surgeons.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rajiv ChandawarkarFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery, The Ohio University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Prakash NadkarniCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Elizabeth BarmashFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery, The Ohio University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Stephany ThomasFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery, The Ohio University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Allison CapekFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery, The Ohio University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Kathleen CaseyFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery, The Ohio University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Freddy CarraderoFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery, The Ohio University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simply working hard is not enough to maintain a profitable clinical practice. Prompt and complete payment for services is just as critical. Revenue cycle management (RCM) tracks the payment process from patient scheduling through treatment, coding, billing, and reimbursement. Even though reimbursement rates for service codes are preset, and the service is documented, this apparently straightforward process is complicated by insurance payors, negotiated contracts, coding requirements, compliance regulators, and an ever-changing reimbursement environment. Not typically trained in RCM, physicians struggle with its demands of timeliness, accuracy, paperwork, and the constant scrutiny for underpayment or unfulfilled reimbursements. Consequently, they often relent to the pressures and simply accept the decreased reimbursements as "cost of doing business" or else relegate RCM to others on the team. In either case, they leave significant amounts of money on the table. Using published work in health care and other allied sectors, we present a systematic method to understand and improve RCM processes. It also creates a strong partnership between clinicians and their administrative counterparts. Optimizing RCM improves patient experience, reduces the time between submission of claims and payment, eliminates fraud at both the coding and patient levels, and increases cash flow, all of which create a financially stable clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID38957721
PMCPMC11219169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.