ArticleResuscitation plus2024
Verification of the termination of resuscitation rules in pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has an unfavorable prognosis; therefore, making accurate predictions of outcomes is crucial for tailoring treatment plans. The termination of resuscitation rules must accurately predict unfavorable outcomes. In this study, we aimed to assess if the current termination of resuscitation rules for adults can predict factors associated with unfavorable outcomes in pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and examine the relationship between these factors and unfavorable outcomes. Methods: A retrospective nationwide cohort study of pediatric cases registered in the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine Multicenter Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry from June 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020, was conducted. The association between the current termination of resuscitation rules and outcomes, such as 30-day mortality and unfavorable 30-day neurological outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, was evaluated. Results: A total of 1,216 participants were included. The positive predictive value for predicting 30-day mortality for each termination of resuscitation rule exceeded 0.9. The specificity and positive predictive value for predicting unfavorable 30-day neurological outcomes were 1.00, indicating that no rules identified favorable outcomes. Factors such as no bystander witness, no return of spontaneous circulation before hospital arrival, no automated external defibrillator or defibrillator use, and no bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation were associated with poor 30-day mortality and neurological outcomes. Conclusion: Adult termination of resuscitation rules had a high positive predictive value for predicting pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, surviving cases make it challenging to use these rules for end-of-resuscitation decisions, indicating the need for identifying new rules to help predict neurological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.